Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 1;117(1):27-56.
doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538.

ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Philip O Katz  1 , Kerry B Dunbar  2   3 , Felice H Schnoll-Sussman  1 , Katarina B Greer  4 , Rena Yadlapati  5 , Stuart Jon Spechler  6   7
Affiliations
Review

ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Philip O Katz et al. Am J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continues to be among the most common diseases seen by gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care physicians. Our understanding of the varied presentations of GERD, enhancements in diagnostic testing, and approach to patient management have evolved. During this time, scrutiny of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased considerably. Although PPIs remain the medical treatment of choice for GERD, multiple publications have raised questions about adverse events, raising doubts about the safety of long-term use and increasing concern about overprescribing of PPIs. New data regarding the potential for surgical and endoscopic interventions have emerged. In this new document, we provide updated, evidence-based recommendations and practical guidance for the evaluation and management of GERD, including pharmacologic, lifestyle, surgical, and endoscopic management. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to evaluate the evidence and the strength of recommendations. Key concepts and suggestions that as of this writing do not have sufficient evidence to grade are also provided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Diagnostic Algorithm for Extraesophageal Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease symptoms
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Management Algorithm of Symptoms Suspected Due to GERD Incompletely Responsive to Proton Pump Inhibitors
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Katz PO, Gerson LB, and Vela MF, Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol, 2013. 108(3): p. 308–28; quiz 329. - PubMed
    1. Guyatt G, et al., GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011. 64(4): p. 383–94. - PubMed
    1. Balshem H, et al., GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011. 64(4): p. 401–6. - PubMed
    1. Andrews JC, et al., GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013. 66(7): p. 726–35. - PubMed
    1. Numans ME, et al., Short-term treatment with proton-pump inhibitors as a test for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test characteristics. Ann Intern Med, 2004. 140(7): p. 518–27. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances