Decision Regret and Quality of Life after Focal Therapy with Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy (TOOKAD®) for Localized Prostate Cancer
- PMID: 34814157
- PMCID: PMC9533463
- DOI: 10.1159/000520084
Decision Regret and Quality of Life after Focal Therapy with Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy (TOOKAD®) for Localized Prostate Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess quality of life (QoL), decision involvement, and decisional regret after treatment with vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) (TOOKAD®) for unilateral low-risk prostate cancer.
Methods: Validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25) capturing QoL post-treatment, involvement in decision-making (Control Preferences Scale) and decision regret (Decisional Regret Scale), were given to patients at the 12-month visit after undergoing VTP at our institution between May 2018 and February 2021.
Results: Out of 44 patients, 36 patients were included in this study and 31 (86.1%) responded to the questionnaires. Mean overall health score capturing QoL at 12 months was 79.3 (standard deviation: ±18.1). 70.9% of the patients (n = 22) had no decision regret, and 67.8% of men (n = 21) had an active role in decision-making. In control biopsy at 12 months post-treatment, 19.4% of patients (n = 7) presented with local recurrence and progression to higher Gleason score (GS) was found in 13.8% of patients (n = 5). Patients (n = 3) presenting with tumor recurrence or progression to higher GS in control biopsy showed a significantly higher level of decision regret (p < 0.009).
Conclusion: Only 9.7% of men (n = 3) felt a strong emotion of regret at 12 months after VTP. Level of decision regret was significantly higher in patients with local recurrence or tumor progression detected in control biopsy. QoL was stable after VTP.
Keywords: Decisional regret; Focal therapy; Prostate cancer; Quality of life; TOOKAD®; Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy.
© 2021 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors made no disclosures.
Similar articles
-
TOOKAD(®) Soluble vascular-targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy: determination of optimal treatment conditions and assessment of effects in patients with localised prostate cancer.BJU Int. 2013 Oct;112(6):766-74. doi: 10.1111/bju.12265. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 24028764 Clinical Trial.
-
Medium-term Follow-up of Vascular-targeted Photodynamic Therapy of Localized Prostate Cancer Using TOOKAD Soluble WST-11 (Phase II Trials).Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Nov;5(6):1022-1028. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 13. Eur Urol Focus. 2019. PMID: 29661587 Clinical Trial.
-
Vascular-targeted Photodynamic Therapy in Unilateral Low-risk Prostate Cancer in Germany: 2-yr Single-centre Experience in a Real-world Setting Compared with Radical Prostatectomy.Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jan;8(1):121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Feb 16. Eur Urol Focus. 2022. PMID: 33602642
-
[Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy in low-risk prostate cancer. A literature review].Prog Urol. 2019 Jul-Aug;29(8-9):393-401. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 29. Prog Urol. 2019. PMID: 31266699 Review. French.
-
Treatment of localized prostate cancer using WST-09 and WST-11 mediated vascular targeted photodynamic therapy-A review.Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2015 Dec;12(4):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 20. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2015. PMID: 26467273 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient-reported Satisfaction and Regret Following Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Feb 18;50:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.003. eCollection 2023 Apr. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023. PMID: 37101771 Free PMC article.
-
Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: Recent advances, challenges and opportunities.Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 23;12:980239. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980239. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36212416 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Azzouzi AR, Vincendeau S, Barret E, Cicco A, Kleinclauss F, van der Poel HG, et al. Padeliporfin vascular- targeted photodynamic therapy versus active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer (CLIN1001 PCM301): an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:181–91. - PubMed
-
- Flegar L, Buerk B, Proschmann R, Propping S, Groeben C, Baunacke M, et al. Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy in unilateral low-risk prostate cancer in Germany: 2-yr single-centre experience in a real-world setting compared with radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Feb 15;S2405-4569((21)) 00042-0. - PubMed
-
- Baydoun A, Traughber B, Morris N, Abi Zeid Daou M, McGraw M, Podder TK, et al. Outcomes and toxicities in patients treated with definitive focal therapy for primary prostate cancer: systematic review. Future Oncol. 2017;13:649–63. - PubMed
-
- Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1250–61. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
