68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: Influence of dual-time and PMT- vs SiPM-based detectors
- PMID: 34823095
- PMCID: PMC8626686
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101293
68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: Influence of dual-time and PMT- vs SiPM-based detectors
Abstract
Objectives: 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT is excellent for evaluating biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR PC). Here, we compared the positivity rates of dual-time point imaging using a PET/CT scanner (DMI) with silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) detectors and a PET/CT scanner (D690) with photomultiplier tubes (PMT), in patients with BCR PC.
Methods: Fifty-eight patients were prospectively recruited and randomized to receive scans on DMI followed by D690 or vice-versa. Images from DMI were reconstructed using the block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) algorithm and images from D690 were reconstructed using ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), according to the vendor's recommendations. Two readers independently reviewed all images in randomized order, recorded the number and location of lesions, as well as standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements.
Results: Twenty-eight patients (group A) had DMI as first scanner followed by D690, while 30 patients (group B) underwent scans in reversed order. Mean PSA was 30±112.9 (range 0.3-600.66) ng/mL for group A and 41.5 ± 213.2 (range 0.21-1170) ng/mL for group B (P = 0.796). The positivity rate in group A was 78.6% (22/28 patients) vs. 73.3% (22/30 patients) in group B. Although the performance of the two scanners was equivalent on a per-patient basis, DMI identified 5 additional sites of suspected recurrent disease when used as first scanner. The second scan time point did not reveal additional abnormal uptake.
Conclusions: The delayed time point in 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT did not show a higher positivity rate. SiPM-based PET/CT identified additional lesions. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results.
Keywords: (68)Ga-PSMA11; PET/CT; PMT; Prostate cancer; SiPM.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The study was partially supported by GE Healthcare. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Head-to-head comparison of a Si-photomultiplier-based and a conventional photomultiplier-based PET-CT system.EJNMMI Phys. 2021 Feb 25;8(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40658-021-00366-7. EJNMMI Phys. 2021. PMID: 33630173 Free PMC article.
-
Results of a Prospective Trial to Compare 68Ga-DOTA-TATE with SiPM-Based PET/CT vs. Conventional PET/CT in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 30;11(6):992. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11060992. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34070751 Free PMC article.
-
More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using 18F-PSMA PET/CT.Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):6-9. doi: 10.1967/s002449910952. Epub 2019 Mar 7. Hell J Nucl Med. 2019. PMID: 30843003
-
Comparison between silicon photomultiplier-based and conventional PET/CT in patients with suspected lung cancer-a pilot study.EJNMMI Res. 2019 Sep 9;9(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13550-019-0504-y. EJNMMI Res. 2019. PMID: 31511997 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Various β Values on Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements in 68Ga-RM2 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Images Reconstructed With a Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization Algorithm.Clin Nucl Med. 2020 Jul;45(7):506-513. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000003075. Clin Nucl Med. 2020. PMID: 32433170
Cited by
-
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT versus 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 14;13:1216894. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1216894. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37645433 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Digital versus Analog 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Performance in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients with Early Biochemical Recurrence or Persistence after Radical Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 26;13(23):3535. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13233535. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38066776 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the accuracy of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT for primary staging of lymph node metastases in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients.EJNMMI Res. 2022 Aug 9;12(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13550-022-00918-7. EJNMMI Res. 2022. PMID: 35943665 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33. - PubMed
-
- Isbarn H., Wanner M., Salomon G., Steuber T., Schlomm T., Kollermann J. Long-term data on the survival of patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in the prostate-specific antigen era. BJU Int. 2010;106(1):37–43. - PubMed
-
- Bott S.R. Management of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2004;7(3):211–216. - PubMed
-
- Panebianco V., Sciarra A., Lisi D., Galati F., Buonocore V., Catalano C. Prostate cancer: 1HMRS-DCEMR at 3T versus [(18)F]choline PET/CT in the detection of local prostate cancer recurrence in men with biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) Eur. J. Radiol. 2012;81(4):700–708. - PubMed
-
- Beer A.J., Eiber M., Souvatzoglou M., Schwaiger M., Krause B.J. Radionuclide and hybrid imaging of recurrent prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(2):181–191. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
