Pleasure, womanhood and the desire for reconstructive surgery after female genital cutting in Belgium
- PMID: 34842011
- DOI: 10.1080/13648470.2021.1994332
Pleasure, womanhood and the desire for reconstructive surgery after female genital cutting in Belgium
Abstract
Growing numbers of women are showing interest in clitoral reconstructive surgery after 'Female Genital Mutilation'. The safety and success of reconstructive surgery, however, has not clearly been established and due to lack of evidence the World Health Organization does not recommend it. Based on anthropological research among patients who requested surgery at the Brussels specialist clinic between 2017 and 2020, this paper looks at two cases of women who actually enjoy sex and experience pleasure but request the procedure to become 'whole again' after stigmatising experiences with health-care professionals, sexual partners or gossip among African migrant communities. An ethnographic approach was used including indepth interviews and participant observation during reception appointments, gynecological consultations, sexology and psychotherapy sessions. Despite limited evidence on the safety of the surgical intervention, surgery is often perceived as the ultimate remedy for the 'missing' clitoris. Such beliefs are nourished by predominant discourses of cut women as 'sexually mutilated'. Following Butler, this article elicits how discursive practices on the physiological sex of a woman can shape her gender identity as a complete or incomplete person. We also examine what it was that changed the patients' mind about the surgery in the process of re-building their confidence through sexology therapy and psychotherapy.
Keywords: Gender; medical anthropology; self-esteem; sexuality; stigma.
Similar articles
-
Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: case studies.J Sex Med. 2015 Jan;12(1):274-81. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12737. Epub 2014 Nov 25. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 25421071
-
Reconstructing Sexuality after Excision: The Medical Tools.Med Anthropol. 2020 Apr;39(3):269-281. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2019.1665670. Epub 2019 Dec 6. Med Anthropol. 2020. PMID: 31809583
-
Reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: a prospective cohort study.Lancet. 2012 Jul 14;380(9837):134-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60400-0. Epub 2012 Jun 12. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22695031
-
Clitoral reconstruction: challenges and new directions.Int J Impot Res. 2023 May;35(3):196-201. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00572-6. Epub 2022 Apr 13. Int J Impot Res. 2023. PMID: 35418603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clitoral Reconstruction After Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Review of Surgical Techniques and Ethical Debate.J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):531-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Jan 10. J Sex Med. 2020. PMID: 31932257 Review.
Cited by
-
Changing gender norms around female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a key role for social work in the Global North.Front Sociol. 2023 Jun 2;8:1187981. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1187981. eCollection 2023. Front Sociol. 2023. PMID: 37333066 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mental and sexual health outcomes associated with FGM/C in Africa: a systematic narrative synthesis.EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jan 10;56:101813. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101813. eCollection 2023 Feb. EClinicalMedicine. 2023. PMID: 36880050 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"Damaged genitals"-Cut women's perceptions of the effect of female genital cutting on sexual function. A qualitative study from Sweden.Front Sociol. 2022 Aug 12;7:943949. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.943949. eCollection 2022. Front Sociol. 2022. PMID: 36033981 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
