Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;24(2):280-287.
doi: 10.1007/s11307-021-01667-0. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

In Vivo Evaluation of Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe for TIM3 Targeting in Mouse Glioma

Affiliations

In Vivo Evaluation of Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe for TIM3 Targeting in Mouse Glioma

Michael Zhang et al. Mol Imaging Biol. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Current checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy strategies in glioblastoma are challenged by mechanisms of resistance including an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. T cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain 3 (TIM3) is a late-phase checkpoint receptor traditionally associated with T cell exhaustion. We apply fluorescent imaging techniques to explore feasibility of in vivo visualization of the immune state in a glioblastoma mouse model.

Procedures: TIM3 monoclonal antibody was conjugated to a near-infrared fluorescent dye, IRDye-800CW (800CW). The TIM3 experimental conjugate and isotype control were assessed for specificity with immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry in murine cell lines (GL261 glioma and RAW264.7 macrophages). C57BL/6 mice with orthotopically implanted GL261 cells were imaged in vivo over 4 days after intravenous TIM3-800CW injection to assess tumor-specific uptake. Cell-specific uptake was then assessed on histologic sections.

Results: The experimental TIM3-800CW, but not its isotype control, bound to RAW264.7 macrophages in vitro. Specificity to RAW264.7 macrophages and not GL261 tumor cells was quantitatively confirmed with the corresponding clone of TIM3 on flow cytometry. In vivo fluorescence imaging of the 800CW signal was localized to the intracranial tumor and significantly higher for the TIM3-800CW cohort, relative to non-targeting isotype control, immediately after tail vein injection and for up to 48 h after injection. Resected organs of tumor bearing mice showed significantly higher uptake in the liver and spleen. TIM3-800CW was seen to co-stain with CD3 (13%), CD11b (29%), and CD206 (26%).

Conclusions: We propose fluorescent imaging of immune cell imaging as a potential strategy for monitoring and localizing immunologically relevant foci in the setting of brain tumors. Alternative markers and target validation will further clarify the temporal relationship of immunosuppressive effector cells throughout glioma resistance.

Keywords: Checkpoint inhibitor; Fluorescence; Glioblastoma; Immune suppression; TIM3.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Immunofluorescence microscopy of RAW 264.7 macrophages following conjugate labeling with (a) TIM3-800CW. Controls were labeled with (b) IgG-800CW and (c) DAPI-only. Images obtained with objective 40, numerical aperture 0.8. (d) Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity of 800CW from single cells segmentations (N = 10 per group). Intensity was measured by the calculated total cell fluorescence (CTCF), calculated as: mean integrated density – (area * mean background).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Interval IVIS Spectrum images obtained at excitation and emission of 745 and 800 nm, small binning, f-stop 2, and 3 seconds of exposure. (b) Line graph of fluorescent signal in vivo for mice injected with TIM3-800CW and IgG-800CW conjugate. Mean fluorescent signal was measured by ratio of the brain tumor region of interest and normal tissue. *p < 0.05
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Representative ex vivo (a) fluorescent and (b) brightfield imaging of organs from mice treated with either TIM3-800CW (N=4) or IgG-800CW (N=4). (c) Dot plot summarizing the average mean fluorescent intensities of organs and their respective standard errors. Organs were collected from Day 3 (cyan dot) and 4 (black dot) of the in vivo trial. *p < 0.05
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Histologic mouse brain sections from a mouse treated with (a-c) TIM3-800CW and (d-f) IgG-800CW conjugates. Low power view using near infrared imaging (b, e). of tumor area for TIM3-800CW versus IgG-800CW (excitation/emission 785/820 nm, resolution = 21 μm). Signal intensities were measured based on segmentations of the corresponding areas of hematoxylin and eosin. These were normalized to contralateral brain (yellow circles). High power view using near infrared imaging (c, f) with DAPI counterstain depicts cellular uptake of TIM3-800CW in tumor. Additional high-power field of controls of (h) contralateral brain (red square), and (i) liver for a mouse treated with TIM3-800CW. Images obtain with objective 20, numerical aperture 0.75.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lim M, Xia Y, Bettegowda C, Weller M (2018) Current state of immunotherapy for glioblastoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15:422–442. - PubMed
    1. McGranahan T, Therkelsen KE, Ahmad S, Nagpal S (2019) Current State of Immunotherapy for Treatment of Glioblastoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 20:24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson CM, Choi J, Lim M (2019) Mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance: lessons from glioblastoma. Nat Immunol 20:1100–1109. - PubMed
    1. Anderson AC, Joller N, Kuchroo VK (2016) Lag-3, Tim-3, and TIGIT: Co-inhibitory Receptors with Specialized Functions in Immune Regulation. Immunity 44:989–1004. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim JE, Patel MA, Mangraviti A, et al. (2017) Combination Therapy with Anti-PD-1, Anti-TIM-3, and Focal Radiation Results in Regression of Murine Gliomas. Clin Cancer Res 23:124–136. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances