Mortality following durable left ventricular assist device implantation by timing and type of first infection
- PMID: 34895722
- PMCID: PMC9094062
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.10.056
Mortality following durable left ventricular assist device implantation by timing and type of first infection
Abstract
Objective: Although infections are common after left ventricular assist device implantation, the relationship between timing and type of first infection with regard to mortality is less well understood.
Methods: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support patients receiving a primary left ventricular assist device from April 2012 to May 2017 were included. The primary exposure was defined 3 ways: any infection, timing of first infection (early: ≤90 days; intermediate: 91-180 days; late: >180 days), and type (ventricular assist device specific, ventricular assist device related, non-ventricular assist device). The association between first infection and all-cause mortality was estimated using Cox regression.
Results: The cohort included 12,957 patients at 166 centers (destination therapy: 47.4%, bridge-to-transplant: 41.2%). First infections were most often non-ventricular assist device (54.2%). Rates of first infection were highest in the early interval (10.7/100 person-months). Patients with any infection had a significantly higher adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio, 2.63; 2.46-2.86). First infection in the intermediate interval was associated with the largest increase in adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio, 3.26; 2.82-3.78), followed by late (hazard ratio, 3.13; 2.77-3.53) and early intervals (hazard ratio, 2.37; 2.16-2.60). Ventricular assist device-related infections were associated with the largest increase in hazard of death (hazard ratio, 3.02; 2.69-3.40), followed by ventricular assist device specific (hazard ratio, 2.92; 2.57-3.32) and non-ventricular assist device (hazard ratio, 2.42; 2.20-2.65).
Conclusions: Relative to those without infection, patients with any postimplantation infection had an increased risk of death. Ventricular assist device-related infections and infections occurring in the intermediate interval were associated with the largest increase in risk of death. After left ventricular assist device implantation, infection prevention strategies should target non-ventricular assist device infections in the first 90 days, then shift to surveillance/prevention of driveline infections after 90 days.
Keywords: infection; mechanical circulatory support; mortality; ventricular assist device.
Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sex-Associated Differences in the Clinical Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: Insights From Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;16(6):e010189. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010189. Epub 2023 May 26. Circ Heart Fail. 2023. PMID: 37232167 Free PMC article.
-
Durability of left ventricular assist devices: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2006 to 2011.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):437-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Mar 13. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23490245
-
Clinical Implications of Respiratory Failure in Patients Receiving Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure.Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;12(11):e006369. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006369. Epub 2019 Nov 11. Circ Heart Fail. 2019. PMID: 31707800
-
Ventricular assist device for end-stage adult congenital heart disease patients: Current status.J Cardiol. 2023 Apr;81(4):378-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Sep 21. J Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36152979 Review.
-
Risk factors, diagnostic methods and treatment of infection in adult patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation: A scoping review.Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Oct;84:103726. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103726. Epub 2024 Jun 8. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38852239 Review.
Cited by
-
Interplay between driveline infection, vessel wall inflammation, cerebrovascular events and mortality in patients with left ventricular assist device.Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 29;13(1):18552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45110-6. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37899422 Free PMC article.
-
Hemoadsorption in LVAD Surgery: Suitable in Theory?J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Jul 5;10(7):286. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10070286. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023. PMID: 37504542 Free PMC article.
-
Infections following left ventricular assist device implantation and 1-year health-related quality of life.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Sep;42(9):1307-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 May 13. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023. PMID: 37187319 Free PMC article.
-
Zwitterionic coating assisted by dopamine with metal-phenolic networks loaded on titanium with improved biocompatibility and antibacterial property for artificial heart.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Apr 17;11:1167340. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1167340. eCollection 2023. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 37139045 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mehra MR, Uriel N, Naka Y, et al. A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device - Final Report. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(17):1618–1627. - PubMed
-
- Pagani FD, Aaronson KD, Kormos R, et al. The NHLBI REVIVE-IT study: Understanding its discontinuation in the context of current left ventricular assist device therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35(11):1277–1283. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
