Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 14;13(1):153.
doi: 10.1186/s13102-021-00380-3.

Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8: psychometric evaluation

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8: psychometric evaluation

Madeline P Casanova et al. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Patient-centered care and evidence-based practice (EBP) are core competencies for health care professionals. The importance of EBP has led to an increase in research involving clinical outcomes; current recommendations emphasize collecting patient focused measures, thus increasing the need for psychometrically sound patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of health. Disablement has been identified as a valuable multi-dimensional construct for patient care. The Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8 (DPA SF-8) has been proposed as a tool to be used in the physically active population that assesses a physical summary component of health and a quality of life component however, further analysis is necessary to ensure the instrument is psychometrically sound.

Methods: Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were conducted on the DPA SF-8 at each time point to ensure factor structure. Reliability of the scale and internal consistency of the subscales were assessed, and a minimal detectable change (MDC) calculated. Additionally, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was also established, and invariance testing across three time points and groups was conducted.

Results: The CFAs at all three visits exceeded recommended model fit indices. The interclass correlation coefficient value (.924) calculated indicated excellent scale reliability and Cronbach's alpha for subscales PHY and QOL were within recommend values. The MDC value calculated was 5.83 and the MCID for persistent injuries were 2 points and for acute injuries, 3 points. The DPA SF-8 was invariant across time and across subgroups.

Conclusions: The DPA SF-8 met CFA recommendations and criteria for multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing, which indicates the scale may be used to assess for differences between the groups or across time. Our overall analysis indicates the DPA SF-8 is a valid, reliable, and responsive instrument to assess patient improvement in the physically active population.

Keywords: Confirmatory factor analysis; Disablement; Patient reported outcome measures; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors, Madeline P. Casanova, Megan C. Nelson, Michael A. Pickering, Lindsay W. Larkins, Karen M. Appleby, Emma J. Grindley, and Russell T. Baker, declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scale structure of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scale structure of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8 visit 1. Chi Sq = Chi Square (χ2), CMIN/DF = the χ2 / degrees of freedom ratio; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; IFI = Bollen’s Incremental Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, df = degrees of freedom, p = alpha level
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8 visit 2. Chi Sq = Chi Square (χ2), CMIN/DF = the χ2/degrees of freedom ratio; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; IFI = Bollen’s Incremental Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, df = degrees of freedom, p = alpha level
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Disablement in the Physically Active Scale Short Form-8 visit 3. Chi Sq = Chi Square (χ2), CMIN/DF = the χ2 / degrees of freedom ratio; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; IFI = Bollen’s Incremental Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, df = degrees of freedom, p = alpha level
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Receiver Operating Curve for Individuals with Persistent Injuries, Visit Two. AUC = area under the curve, MCID = minimal clinically important difference
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Receiver Operating Curve for Individuals with Persistent Injuries, Visit Three. AUC = area under the curve, MCID = minimal clinically important difference
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Receiver Operating Curve for Individuals with Acute and Subacute Injuries, Visit Two. AUC = area under the curve, MCID = minimal clinically important difference
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Receiver Operating Curve for Individuals with Acute and Subacute Injuries, Visit Three. AUC = area under the curve, MCID = minimal clinically important difference

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Institute of Medicine . Health professions education: a bridge to quality. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2003. - PubMed
    1. National Athletic Trainers’ Association. Athletic Training Education Competencies. 5th ed. Dallas, TX; 2011.
    1. Law MC, MacDermid J. Evidence-based rehabilitation. 3rd ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Incorporated; 2014.
    1. Straus SE, Glasziou P, Richardson WS, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 5. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2019.
    1. Arnold BL, Gansneder BM, Perrin DH. Research Methods in Athletic Training. Philadephia, PA: F.A. Davis Company; 2005.

LinkOut - more resources