Gender Differences in the Maltreatment-Youth Offending Relationship: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 34907817
- PMCID: PMC10012399
- DOI: 10.1177/15248380211052106
Gender Differences in the Maltreatment-Youth Offending Relationship: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Maltreated and child welfare-involved youth are over-represented in juvenile justice systems. These youth are at a greater risk of serious offending and justice system entrenchment relative to their non-maltreated peers. Understanding gender differences in the pathways to justice involvement and the nature of offending among maltreated children is critical for informing policy and practice. Yet, this body of evidence is fragmented. This scoping review identified and narratively synthesized evidence from studies reporting on gender differences in the individual characteristics, maltreatment experiences, child protection involvement and offending profiles of maltreated youth who offend. A comprehensive search of four databases generated 11,568 publications, from which 180 met the review's inclusion criteria. These primary studies included participants aged 8-21 years with a history of childhood maltreatment and youth offending and reported at least one gendered analysis. Some consistent findings were reported across studies. A greater level of child welfare involvement and maltreatment exposure (particularly sexual abuse and multi-type maltreatment) was found for justice involved girls, relative to boys. Maltreated and child welfare-involved boys appear more likely to offend than girls, but findings about how gender moderates the maltreatment-offending relationship were inconsistent. Child welfare systems involvement (particularly foster care and residential care) appeared to be an important moderator for girls, and school performance mediated outcomes for boys. Across this body of evidence, few studies accounted for under-reporting of abuse and neglect when using youth self-report measures of maltreatment. Future research is needed which explicitly explores how gender moderates the maltreatment-offending relationship.
Keywords: child welfare; crossover youth; juvenile justice; maltreatment; out-of-home care; youth offending.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Maltreatment, Child Welfare, and Recidivism in a Sample of Deep-End Crossover Youth.J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Apr;45(4):625-54. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0407-9. Epub 2015 Dec 23. J Youth Adolesc. 2016. PMID: 26699636
-
Youth Dually-Involved in the Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice Systems: Varying Definitions and Their Associations with Trauma Exposure, Posttraumatic Stress, & Offending.Child Youth Serv Rev. 2023 Jul;150:106998. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106998. Epub 2023 May 6. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2023. PMID: 37745625
-
The child protection and juvenile justice nexus in Australia: A longitudinal examination of the relationship between maltreatment and offending.Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Feb;64:32-46. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.11.028. Epub 2016 Dec 23. Child Abuse Negl. 2017. PMID: 28017908
-
Child Maltreatment and the Child Welfare System as Environmental Factors in the International Classification of Functioning.Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jan 17;2:710629. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.710629. eCollection 2021. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022. PMID: 36188868 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of Child Advocacy Centers and the multidisciplinary team approach on prosecution rates of alleged sex offenders and satisfaction of non-offending caregivers with allegations of child sexual abuse: a systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan 15;13(12):93-129. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2113. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 26767818 Review.
Cited by
-
Why Are Child and Youth Welfare Support Services Initiated? A First-Time Analysis of Administrative Data on Child and Youth Welfare Services in Austria.Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;10(8):1376. doi: 10.3390/children10081376. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37628375 Free PMC article.
References
-
- AIHW . (2016). Vulnerable young people: Interactions across homelessness, youth justice and child protection. AIHW.
-
- AIHW . (2020). Youth justice in Australia 2018-19. AIHW.
-
- Armstrong G. S., Cain C. M., Wylie L. E., Muftic L. R., Bouffard L. A. (2018). Risk factor profile of youth incarcerated for child to parent violence: A nationally representative sample. Journal of Criminal Justice, 58, 1-9. 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.06.002. - DOI
-
- Arskey H., O’Malley L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616. - DOI
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) . (2012). Children and young people at risk of social exclusion: Links between homelessness, child protection and juvenile justice. AIHW.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
