Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 2:12:758226.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758226. eCollection 2021.

Support From Parents, Peers, and Teachers Is Differently Associated With Middle School Students' Well-Being

Affiliations

Support From Parents, Peers, and Teachers Is Differently Associated With Middle School Students' Well-Being

Frances Hoferichter et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Parents, peers, and teachers provide a powerful context for school students' well-being. However, a detailed and systematic analysis of how parental, peer, and teacher support relate to students' well-being, measured by the dimensions self-worth, psychological and physical well-being, is still missing. To address this research gap, the following study investigates 733 adolescent German students from grades 7 and 8 (M age = 13.97, SD = 0.41, 52% girls) with respect to their perceived supportive relationships at home and within the school context. The study considers gender, socioeconomic status, and school form as potential confounders. The results of the structural equation model, analyzed with the statistical software R, indicate that perceived teacher support was positively related to students' self-worth and physical well-being, while peer support was related to psychological well-being. Students who perceived their parents as supportive reported higher well-being with respect to all three dimensions investigated.

Keywords: middle school students; parents; peers; social support; teachers; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Structural equation model for regression analysis, including control variables. Gender: female = 0, male = 1, school type* = contrasts students from low-track and high-track schools with students from mixed-track schools; school type** = contrasts students from low-track and mixed track school with students from high-track schools; coefficients are displayed unstandardized first, and standardized in second position; only significant paths are shown for clarity; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams R. E., Santo J. B., Bukowski W. M. (2011). The presence of a best friend buffers the effects of negative experiences. Dev. Psychol. 47 1786–1791. 10.1037/a0025401 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am. Psychol. 57 1060–1073. 10.1037/0003-066x.57.12.1060 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amholt T. T., Dammeyer J., Carter R., Niclasen J. (2020). Psychological well-being and academic achievement among school aged children: a systematic review. Child Indicators Res. 13 1523–1548. 10.1007/s12187-020-09725-9729 - DOI
    1. Arnett J. J. (1999). Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. Am. Psychol. 54 317–326. 10.1037//0003-066x.54.5.317 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arslan G., Allen K. A., Tanhan A. (2021). School bullying, mental health, and wellbeing in adolescents: mediating impact of positive psychological orientations. Child Indicators Res. 14 1007–1026. 10.1007/s12187-020-09780-2 - DOI