Responses to a Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 According to Baseline Antibody and Antigen Levels : A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 34928698
- PMCID: PMC9334931
- DOI: 10.7326/M21-3507
Responses to a Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 According to Baseline Antibody and Antigen Levels : A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial, bamlanivimab, a SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, given in combination with remdesivir, did not improve outcomes among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 based on an early futility assessment.
Objective: To evaluate the a priori hypothesis that bamlanivimab has greater benefit in patients without detectable levels of endogenous neutralizing antibody (nAb) at study entry than in those with antibodies, especially if viral levels are high.
Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04501978).
Setting: Multicenter trial.
Patients: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 without end-organ failure.
Intervention: Bamlanivimab (7000 mg) or placebo.
Measurements: Antibody, antigen, and viral RNA levels were centrally measured on stored specimens collected at baseline. Patients were followed for 90 days for sustained recovery (defined as discharge to home and remaining home for 14 consecutive days) and a composite safety outcome (death, serious adverse events, organ failure, or serious infections).
Results: Among 314 participants (163 receiving bamlanivimab and 151 placebo), the median time to sustained recovery was 19 days and did not differ between the bamlanivimab and placebo groups (subhazard ratio [sHR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.22]; sHR > 1 favors bamlanivimab). At entry, 50% evidenced production of anti-spike nAbs; 50% had SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid plasma antigen levels of at least 1000 ng/L. Among those without and with nAbs at study entry, the sHRs were 1.24 (CI, 0.90 to 1.70) and 0.74 (CI, 0.54 to 1.00), respectively (nominal P for interaction = 0.018). The sHR (bamlanivimab vs. placebo) was also more than 1 for those with plasma antigen or nasal viral RNA levels above median level at entry and was greatest for those without antibodies and with elevated levels of antigen (sHR, 1.48 [CI, 0.99 to 2.23]) or viral RNA (sHR, 1.89 [CI, 1.23 to 2.91]). Hazard ratios for the composite safety outcome (<1 favors bamlanivimab) also differed by serostatus at entry: 0.67 (CI, 0.37 to 1.20) for those without and 1.79 (CI, 0.92 to 3.48) for those with nAbs.
Limitation: Subgroup analysis of a trial prematurely stopped because of futility; small sample size; multiple subgroups analyzed.
Conclusion: Efficacy and safety of bamlanivimab may differ depending on whether an endogenous nAb response has been mounted. The limited sample size of the study does not allow firm conclusions based on these findings, and further independent trials are required that assess other types of passive immune therapies in the same patient setting.
Primary funding source: U.S. government Operation Warp Speed and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody for Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 11;384(10):905-914. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2033130. Epub 2020 Dec 22. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 33356051 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Bamlanivimab as Monotherapy or in Combination With Etesevimab on Viral Load in Patients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):632-644. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0202. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 33475701 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Bamlanivimab vs Placebo on Incidence of COVID-19 Among Residents and Staff of Skilled Nursing and Assisted Living Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2021 Jul 6;326(1):46-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.8828. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34081073 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Bamlanivimab reduces nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels but not symptom duration in non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19.medRxiv. 2021 Dec 21:2021.12.17.21268009. doi: 10.1101/2021.12.17.21268009. Preprint. medRxiv. 2021. PMID: 34981077 Free PMC article.
-
Neutralizing Antibody Therapeutics for COVID-19.Viruses. 2021 Apr 7;13(4):628. doi: 10.3390/v13040628. Viruses. 2021. PMID: 33916927 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect on SARS-CoV-2 viral load using combination therapy with casirivimab/imdevimab and remdesivir.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 May 18;35(5):655-657. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2075676. eCollection 2022. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022. PMID: 35991712 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-center matched cohort study of convalescent plasma for hospitalized patients with COVID-19.PLoS One. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0273223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273223. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35980913 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With Moderate to Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Phase 2a Trial.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 27;9(8):ofac343. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac343. eCollection 2022 Aug. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35959207 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Ensovibep for Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 : A Randomized Controlled Trial.Ann Intern Med. 2022 Aug 9:M22-1503. doi: 10.7326/M22-1503. Online ahead of print. Ann Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 35939810 Free PMC article.
-
What, Where, When and How of COVID-19 Patents Landscape: A Bibliometrics Review.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 1;9:925369. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.925369. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35847804 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous