Effects of the combination of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and nano-hydroxyapatite on the osseointegration of dental implants
- PMID: 34969019
- PMCID: PMC8721409
- DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.6.454
Effects of the combination of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and nano-hydroxyapatite on the osseointegration of dental implants
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the in vitro osteoinductivity of the combination of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp) and the in vivo effects of implants coated with nHAp/BMP-2.
Materials and methods: To evaluate the in vitro efficacy of nHAp/BMP-2 on bone formation, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) were seeded onto titanium disks coated with collagen (Col), Col/nHAp, or Col/nHAp/BMP-2. Protein levels were determined by a biochemical assay and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Stem cell differentiation was analyzed by flow cytometry. For in vivo studies with mice, Col, Col/nHAp, and Col/nHAp/BMP-2 were injected in subcutaneous pockets. Titanium implants or implants coated with Col/nHAp/BMP-2 were placed bilaterally on rabbit tibias and evaluated for 4 weeks.
Results: In the in vitro study, BM-MSCs on Col/nHAp/BMP-2 showed reduced levels of CD73, CD90, and CD105 and increased levels of glycosaminoglycan, osteopontin, and alkaline phosphatase activity. After 4 weeks, the Col/nHAp/BMP-2 implant showed greater bone formation than the control (P=0.07), while no differences were observed in bone implant contact and removal torque.
Conclusion: These results suggest that a combination of BMP-2 and an nHAp carrier would activate osseointegration on dental implant surfaces.
Keywords: Bone morphogenetic protein 2; Collagen; Dental implant; Hydroxyapatite; Osseointegration.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Biologic properties of nano-hydroxyapatite: An in vivo study of calvarial defects, ectopic bone formation and bone implantation.Biomed Mater Eng. 2015;25(1):25-38. doi: 10.3233/BME-141244. Biomed Mater Eng. 2015. PMID: 25585978
-
Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;72(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.031. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24331565
-
Comparison of bone morphogenetic protein-2 delivery systems to induce supracrestal bone guided by titanium implants in the rabbit mandible.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Jun;27(6):676-85. doi: 10.1111/clr.12645. Epub 2015 Jul 16. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016. PMID: 26183057
-
The promotion of bone regeneration by nanofibrous hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds by effects on integrin-BMP/Smad signaling pathway in BMSCs.Biomaterials. 2013 Jun;34(18):4404-17. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.048. Epub 2013 Mar 17. Biomaterials. 2013. PMID: 23515177
-
Potential Beneficial Effects of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles on Caries Lesions In Vitro-A Review of the Literature.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Feb 7;11(2):40. doi: 10.3390/dj11020040. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36826185 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Nanohydroxyapatite in dentistry: A comprehensive review.Saudi Dent J. 2023 Sep;35(6):741-752. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.018. Epub 2023 Jun 7. Saudi Dent J. 2023. PMID: 37817794 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of biomolecule-based bioactive surfaces, on os-seointegration of titanium dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 26;10:986112. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.986112. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36225604 Free PMC article.
-
Modification of implant surfaces to stimulate mesenchymal cell activation.Bull Natl Res Cent. 2022;46(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s42269-022-00743-x. Epub 2022 Mar 4. Bull Natl Res Cent. 2022. PMID: 35261541 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, Suzuki M, Silva NR, Cardaropoli G, et al. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88:579–96. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31264. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Coelho PG, Kang BS, Sul YT, Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28:198–206. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Aragão FJ, Cooper LF. Advancing dental implant surface technology--from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3822–35. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.012. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jovanovic SA, Hunt DR, Bernard GW, Spiekermann H, Nishimura R, Wozney JM, et al. Long-term functional loading of dental implants in rhBMP-2 induced bone. A histologic study in the canine ridge augmentation model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:793–803. doi: 10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.clr140617.x. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0905-7161.2003.clr140617.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Park JC, Kim JC, Kim BK, Cho KS, Im GI, Kim BS, et al. Dose- and time-dependent effects of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on the osteogenic and adipogenic potentials of alveolar bone-derived stromal cells. J Periodontal Res. 2012;47:645–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01477.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01477.x. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
