Contribution of laryngeal size to differences between male and female voice production
- PMID: 34972311
- PMCID: PMC8716178
- DOI: 10.1121/10.0009033
Contribution of laryngeal size to differences between male and female voice production
Abstract
In this study we investigated the effect of sex- and age-related differences in vocal fold length, thickness, and depth on voice production in a three-dimensional vocal fold model. The results showed that the cause-effect relationships between vocal fold physiology and voice production previously identified in an adult male-like vocal fold geometry remained qualitatively the same in vocal folds with geometry representative of adult females and children. We further showed that the often-observed differences in voice production between adult males, adult females, and children can be explained by differences in length and thickness. The lower F0, higher flow rate, larger vocal fold vibration amplitude, and higher sound pressure level (SPL) in adult males as compared to adult females and children can be explained by differences in vocal fold length. In contrast, the thickness effect dominated and contributed to the larger closed quotient of vocal fold vibration, larger normalized maximum flow declination rate, and lower H1-H2 in adult males as compared to adult females and children. The effect of differences in vocal fold depth was generally small. When targeting a specific SPL, adult males experienced a lower peak vocal fold contact pressure during phonation than adult females and children.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Laryngeal strategies to minimize vocal fold contact pressure and their effect on voice production.J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Aug;148(2):1039. doi: 10.1121/10.0001796. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020. PMID: 32873018 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of vocal fold stiffness on voice production in a three-dimensional body-cover phonation model.J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Oct;142(4):2311. doi: 10.1121/1.5008497. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017. PMID: 29092586 Free PMC article.
-
Oral vibratory sensations during voice production at different laryngeal and semi-occluded vocal tract configurations.J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jul;152(1):302. doi: 10.1121/10.0012365. J Acoust Soc Am. 2022. PMID: 35931496 Free PMC article.
-
Vocal fold dynamics for frequency change.J Voice. 2014 Jul;28(4):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Apr 13. J Voice. 2014. PMID: 24726331 Review.
-
What can vortices tell us about vocal fold vibration and voice production.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jun;16(3):183-7. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282ff5fc5. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008. PMID: 18475068 Review.
Cited by
-
Restraining vocal fold vertical motion reduces source-filter interaction in a two-mass model.JASA Express Lett. 2024 Mar 1;4(3):035201. doi: 10.1121/10.0025124. JASA Express Lett. 2024. PMID: 38426891 Free PMC article.
-
Histologic Examination of Vocal Fold Mucosal Wave and Vibration.Laryngoscope. 2024 Jan;134(1):264-271. doi: 10.1002/lary.30928. Epub 2023 Jul 31. Laryngoscope. 2024. PMID: 37522475
-
Vocal Fold Vertical Thickness in Human Voice Production and Control: A Review.J Voice. 2023 Mar 22:S0892-1997(23)00078-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.02.021. Online ahead of print. J Voice. 2023. PMID: 36964073 Review.
-
Phonetic Realizations of Metrical Structure in Tone Languages: Evidence From Chinese Dialects.Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 13;13:945973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945973. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35911037 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
