Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined With Chemotherapy Compared With Chemotherapy Alone for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 34976837
- PMCID: PMC8716854
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.795650
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined With Chemotherapy Compared With Chemotherapy Alone for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: It is still controversial whether immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can improve the curative effect when added to original standard chemotherapy treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We compared their antitumor efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) to make a better clinical decision.
Methods: Seven databases were searched for eligible articles. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AEs were measured as the primary outcomes.
Results: Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 4,501 patients were included. ICI+chemotherapy treatment achieved better PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78, [0.70-0.86], p < 0.00001), OS (HR: 0.86, [0.74-0.99], p = 0.04), and complete response (584/1,106 vs. 341/825, risk ratio [RR]: 1.38, [1.01-1.89], p = 0.04). With the prolongation of survival, the survival advantage of ICI+chemotherapy increased compared with chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis suggested that the addition of ICIs might not have a better effect in Asian patients, patients with locally advanced disease, or patients with brain metastases. In the toxicity analysis, more Grade 3-5 AEs and serious AEs were found in the ICI+chemotherapy group. For Grade 3-5 AEs, more cases of diarrhea, severe skin reactions, pneumonitis, hepatitis, and adrenal insufficiency were related to the ICI+chemotherapy group.
Conclusions: ICI+chemotherapy appears to be better than chemotherapy alone for TNBC treatment, with better OS and PFS. However, its high rates of serious AEs need to be taken seriously.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021276394.
Keywords: chemotherapy; immune checkpoint inhibitors; meta-analysis; systematic review; triple-negative breast cancer.
Copyright © 2021 Ji, Ding, Hao, Luo, Huang and Zhang.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Predictive value of PD-L1 expression to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Dec 2;13:1004821. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1004821. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36532783 Free PMC article.
-
Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy for advanced gastric and esophageal cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Immunopharmacol. 2022 Dec;113(Pt A):109317. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109317. Epub 2022 Oct 14. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36252494 Review.
-
Liver metastases and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 18;12:978069. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.978069. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36330494 Free PMC article.
-
Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2021 Nov 23;21(1):1261. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08997-w. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34814874 Free PMC article.
-
PARP inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2023 Mar;91(3):203-217. doi: 10.1007/s00280-023-04506-x. Epub 2023 Feb 2. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 36725727 Review.
Cited by
-
Eribulin promotes proliferation of CD8+ T cells and potentiates T cell-mediated anti-tumor activity against triple-negative breast cancer cells.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan;203(1):57-71. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07111-x. Epub 2023 Sep 21. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024. PMID: 37733186
-
Herpesvirus entry mediator as a potential biomarker in breast cancer compared with conventional cytotoxic T‑lymphocyte‑associated antigen 4.Biomed Rep. 2023 Jul 17;19(2):56. doi: 10.3892/br.2023.1638. eCollection 2023 Aug. Biomed Rep. 2023. PMID: 37560313 Free PMC article.
-
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line therapies of metastatic or early triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 May 9;14:1137464. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137464. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37229447 Free PMC article.
-
Dysregulation of systemic soluble immune checkpoints in early breast cancer is attenuated following administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is associated with recovery of CD27, CD28, CD40, CD80, ICOS and GITR and substantially increased levels of PD-L1, LAG-3 and TIM-3.Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 30;13:1097309. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1097309. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37064132 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive value of PD-L1 expression to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Dec 2;13:1004821. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1004821. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36532783 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
