Background: Significant levels of funding have been provided to low- and middle-income countries for development assistance for health, with most funds coming through direct bilateral investment led by the USA and the UK. Direct attribution of impact to large-scale programs funded by donors remains elusive due the difficulty of knowing what would have happened without those programs, and the lack of detailed contextual information to support causal interpretation of changes.
Methods: This study uses the synthetic control analysis method to estimate the impact of one donor's funding (United States Agency for International Development, USAID) on under-five mortality across several low- and middle-income countries that received above average levels of USAID funding for maternal and child health programs between 2000 and 2016.
Results: In the study period (2000-16), countries with above average USAID funding had an under-five mortality rate lower than the synthetic control by an average of 29 deaths per 1000 live births (year-to-year range of - 2 to - 38). This finding was consistent with several sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: The synthetic control method is a valuable addition to the range of approaches for quantifying the impact of large-scale health programs in low- and middle-income countries. The findings suggest that adequately funded donor programs (in this case USAID) help countries to reduce child mortality to significantly lower rates than would have occurred without those investments.
Keywords: Child mortality; Donor assistance; Impact evaluation; Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI); Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); Maternal and child health (MCH); Quasi-experimental methods; Synthetic control analysis; United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
© 2021. The Author(s).