Accuracy of CT-Derived Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: The Impact of the Severity of Preoperative Varus Ankle Deformity

Foot Ankle Spec. 2023 Jun;16(3):205-213. doi: 10.1177/19386400211068262. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

Abstract

Background: Significant preoperative varus tibiotalar deformity was once believed to be a contraindication for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Our primary goal was to evaluate the influence of increasing preoperative varus tibiotalar deformity on the accuracy of final implant positioning using computed tomography (CT)-derived patient-specific guides for TAA.

Methods: Thirty-two patients with varus ankle arthritis underwent TAA using CT-derived patient-specific guides. Patients were subcategorized into varying degrees of deformity based on preoperative tibiotalar angles (0°-5° neutral, 6°-10° mild, 11°-15° moderate, and >15° severe). Postoperative weightbearing radiographs were used to measure coronal plane alignment of the tibial implant relative to the target axis determined by the preoperative CT template. Average follow-up at the time of data collection was 36.8 months.

Results: Average preoperative varus deformity was 6.06° (range: 0.66°-16.3°). Postoperatively, 96.9% (30/31) of patients demonstrated neutral implant alignment. Average postoperative tibial implant deviation was 1.54° (range: 0.17°-5.7°). Average coronal deviation relative to the target axis was 1.61° for the neutral group, 1.78° for the mild group, 0.94° for the moderate group, and 1.41° for the severe group (P = .256). Preoperative plans predicted 100% of tibial and talar implant sizes correctly within 1 size of actual implant size. Conclusion. Our study supports the claim that neutral postoperative TAA alignment can be obtained using CT-derived patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). Furthermore, final implant alignment accuracy with PSI does not appear to be impacted by worsening preoperative varus deformity. All but one patient (96.9%) achieved neutral postoperative alignment relative to the predicted target axis.

Level of evidence: Level IV, Clinical Case Series.

Keywords: arthritis and joint disease; comorbid conditions; diagnostic & therapeutic techniques; forefoot-toe-midfoot; implant arthroplasty; implants; joint replacement; new technology assessment; practice management.

MeSH terms

  • Ankle Joint / diagnostic imaging
  • Ankle Joint / surgery
  • Ankle* / surgery
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle* / methods
  • Humans
  • Lower Extremity / surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed