Background: Postpartum depression (PPD) and related maternal mood disorders affect anywhere from 7% to 19% of postpartum women. Although historically a neglected issue, there has been a strong impetus in the past few decades to implement routine, universal screening and to address PPD as a major public health concern. Still, there has been relatively little analysis of how the quality of the birth experience influences subsequent maternal mental health. We examine the relationship between perceived birth experience and two PPD screeners (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Postpartum Depression Screening Scale).
Methods: Data came from waves I and II of the Listening to Mothers data set. This is the only national survey of US women's childbirth and postpartum experiences. In logistic and linear regression models, we used a 12-item "feeling" index (perceived birth experience) to predict (a) overall PPD screener scores, and (b) likelihood of meeting the clinical cutoff for depression risk. We also controlled for other known socio-demographic and obstetric risk factors.
Results: Perceived birth experience strongly and consistently predicted both PPD screener measures, and in both forms-raw scores and clinical cutoffs. By contrast, other known risk factors had inconsistent results across the two screeners.
Discussion: Perceived birth experience should be considered more central in assessing PPD. It may also be more robust than the PPD screeners used in practice, and therefore, could be a more reliable predictor of PPD. Providers should consider how the improved social-psychological quality of women's birth experience can act as a buffer to PPD and other postpartum concerns.
Keywords: birth experience; maternal mental health; postpartum depression; regression analysis.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.