Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 15:13:71-79.
doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S344933. eCollection 2022.

The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students' Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

The Promise of the New Educational Strategy for Curriculum Development (SPICES) Model on the Development of Students' Clinical Reasoning Ability. A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Equlinet Misganaw et al. Adv Med Educ Pract. .

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical reasoning skills are a core competency that must be taught at all levels of health-care education. In the last decade, several health professional education curricula in Ethiopia have been redesigned with the goal of improving student competence in key health-care delivery skills. Despite the fact that some academic programs followed the conventional educational strategy, a significant number of academic programs adopted a new educational strategy for curriculum development: Student-centered, Problem-based, Integrated, Community-based, Elective, and Systematic (SPICES) model. More empirical evidence, however, is required to determine whether the new curricular approach is effective in improving students' clinical reasoning. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the new educational strategy for curriculum development improves the clinical reasoning ability of midwifery students when compared to a peer institution that follows a traditional curriculum.

Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the clinical reasoning skills of midwifery students who completed the new curricular approach versus students who completed a traditional curriculum. A Script Concordance Test (SCT) was used to collect data. The mean SCT score and an independent two-sample t-test were calculated to see if the two groups differed significantly in terms of clinical reasoning skills in managing Post-Partum hemorrhage (PPH).

Results: A total of 77 final-year midwifery students participated (38 from the new and 39 from the traditional curriculum approach). Midwifery students who completed the new and conventional curriculum approaches had mean clinical reasoning SCT scores of 0.7 (SD = 0.35) and 0.53 (SD = 0.37), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall mean SCT score between the two study groups in terms of clinical reasoning skills (p = 0.008).

Conclusion: Our study found that the new SPICES model curricular approach is promising in fostering the development of clinical reasoning skills of Midwifery students in managing PPH.

Keywords: Ethiopia; SPICES model Curriculum; clinical reasoning skills; midwifery; post-partum hemorrhage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean clinical reasoning skills score of each SCT items by their study groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Edu. 2011;45(1):60–68. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03757.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loftus S. Rethinking clinical reasoning: time for a dialogical turn. Med Edu. 2012;46(12):1174–1178. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04353.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Croskerry P. A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med. 2009;84(8):1022–1028. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace703 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rencic J. Twelve tips for teaching expertise in clinical reasoning. Med Teach. 2011;33(11):887–892. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.558142 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elstein AS. Thinking about diagnostic thinking: a 30-year perspective. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14(S1):7–18. doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9184-0 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources