An observational study of workflows to support fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices serving Medicaid enrollees
- PMID: 35078444
- PMCID: PMC8787027
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-09106-7
An observational study of workflows to support fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices serving Medicaid enrollees
Abstract
Background: Screening supports early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Provision of fecal immunochemical tests/fecal occult blood tests (FIT/FOBT) in primary care can increase CRC screening, particularly in populations experiencing health disparities. This study was conducted to describe clinical workflows for FIT/FOBT in Oregon primary care practices and to identify specific workflow processes that might be associated (alone or in combination) with higher (versus lower) CRC screening rates.
Methods: Primary care practices were rank ordered by CRC screening rates in Oregon Medicaid enrollees who turned age 50 years from January 2013 to June 2014 (i.e., newly age-eligible). Practices were recruited via purposive sampling based on organizational characteristics and CRC screening rates. Data collected were from surveys, observation visits, and informal interviews, and used to create practice-level CRC screening workflow reports. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, qualitative data analysis using an immersion-crystallization process, and a matrix analysis approach.
Results: All participating primary care practices (N=9) used visit-based workflows, and four higher performing and two lower performing used population outreach workflows to deliver FIT/FOBTs. However, higher performing practices (n=5) had more established workflows and staff to support activities. Visit-based strategies in higher performing practices included having dedicated staff identify patients due for CRC screening and training medical assistants to review FIT/FOBT instructions with patients. Population outreach strategies included having clinic staff generate lists and check them for accuracy prior to direct mailing of kits to patients. For both workflow types, higher performing clinics routinely utilized systems for patient reminders and follow-up after FIT/FOBT distribution.
Conclusions: Primary care practices with higher CRC screening rates among newly age-eligible Medicaid enrollees had more established visit-based and population outreach workflows to support identifying patients due for screening, FIT/FOBT distribution, reminders, and follow up. Key to practices with higher CRC screening was having medical assistants discuss and review FIT/FOBT screening and instructions with patients. Findings present important workflow processes for primary care practices and may facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions into real-world, clinical settings.
Keywords: colorectal cancer; early detection of cancer; population health; primary health care; underserved populations; workflow.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Association Between Primary Care Visits and Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the Era of Population Health Outreach.J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1190-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3760-9. Epub 2016 Jun 8. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27279097 Free PMC article.
-
Mailed FIT (fecal immunochemical test), navigation or patient reminders? Using microsimulation to inform selection of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening in Medicaid enrollees.Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105836. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105836. Epub 2019 Oct 18. Prev Med. 2019. PMID: 31635848 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing Mailed Colorectal Cancer Fecal Screening Tests in Real-World Primary Care Settings: Promising Implementation Practices and Opportunities for Improvement.Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):124-135. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01496-3. Epub 2023 Mar 23. Prev Sci. 2024. PMID: 36952143 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States - How, what and when?BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 6;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3813-4. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29304835 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selection of patients for large mailed fecal immunochemical test colorectal cancer screening outreach programs: A systematic review.J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):379-388. doi: 10.1177/0969141321997482. Epub 2021 Mar 8. J Med Screen. 2021. PMID: 33683155 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Chondroitin polymerizing factor (CHPF) promotes the progression of colorectal cancer through ASB2-mediated ubiquitylation of SMAD9.Histol Histopathol. 2024 Nov;39(11):1493-1503. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-738. Epub 2024 Mar 26. Histol Histopathol. 2024. PMID: 38591191
-
Data Challenges in Identifying Patients Due for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Clinics.J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Feb 8;36(1):118-129. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220216R1. J Am Board Fam Med. 2023. PMID: 36759133 Free PMC article.
-
The COMPASS study: A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion.Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106852. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852. Epub 2022 Jul 13. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022. PMID: 35842109 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot.J Rural Health. 2023 Jan;39(1):279-290. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12685. Epub 2022 Jun 15. J Rural Health. 2023. PMID: 35703582 Free PMC article.
-
Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.Ann Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;20(2):123-129. doi: 10.1370/afm.2772. Ann Fam Med. 2022. PMID: 35346927 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2017-2019 Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; 2017 [Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-....
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Colorectal Cancer Screening in U.S.; 2017.
-
- American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2020-2022. Atlanta; 2020.
-
- National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. 80% by 2018 NCCRT.org: NCCRT; 2016 [Available from: http://nccrt.org/tools/80-percent-by-2018/.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
