Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Jan 25;22(1):106.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09106-7.

An observational study of workflows to support fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices serving Medicaid enrollees

Affiliations
Observational Study

An observational study of workflows to support fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices serving Medicaid enrollees

Cynthia M Mojica et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Screening supports early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Provision of fecal immunochemical tests/fecal occult blood tests (FIT/FOBT) in primary care can increase CRC screening, particularly in populations experiencing health disparities. This study was conducted to describe clinical workflows for FIT/FOBT in Oregon primary care practices and to identify specific workflow processes that might be associated (alone or in combination) with higher (versus lower) CRC screening rates.

Methods: Primary care practices were rank ordered by CRC screening rates in Oregon Medicaid enrollees who turned age 50 years from January 2013 to June 2014 (i.e., newly age-eligible). Practices were recruited via purposive sampling based on organizational characteristics and CRC screening rates. Data collected were from surveys, observation visits, and informal interviews, and used to create practice-level CRC screening workflow reports. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, qualitative data analysis using an immersion-crystallization process, and a matrix analysis approach.

Results: All participating primary care practices (N=9) used visit-based workflows, and four higher performing and two lower performing used population outreach workflows to deliver FIT/FOBTs. However, higher performing practices (n=5) had more established workflows and staff to support activities. Visit-based strategies in higher performing practices included having dedicated staff identify patients due for CRC screening and training medical assistants to review FIT/FOBT instructions with patients. Population outreach strategies included having clinic staff generate lists and check them for accuracy prior to direct mailing of kits to patients. For both workflow types, higher performing clinics routinely utilized systems for patient reminders and follow-up after FIT/FOBT distribution.

Conclusions: Primary care practices with higher CRC screening rates among newly age-eligible Medicaid enrollees had more established visit-based and population outreach workflows to support identifying patients due for screening, FIT/FOBT distribution, reminders, and follow up. Key to practices with higher CRC screening was having medical assistants discuss and review FIT/FOBT screening and instructions with patients. Findings present important workflow processes for primary care practices and may facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions into real-world, clinical settings.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; early detection of cancer; population health; primary health care; underserved populations; workflow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Primary care practice sampling

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2017-2019 Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; 2017 [Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-....
    1. Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, Rutter CM, Webber EM, O'Connor E, et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Jama. 2016;315(23):2576–2594. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3332. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Colorectal Cancer Screening in U.S.; 2017.
    1. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2020-2022. Atlanta; 2020.
    1. National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. 80% by 2018 NCCRT.org: NCCRT; 2016 [Available from: http://nccrt.org/tools/80-percent-by-2018/.

Publication types