Assessing How Consumers Interpret and Act on Results From At-Home COVID-19 Self-test Kits: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 35099501
- PMCID: PMC8804977
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.8075
Assessing How Consumers Interpret and Act on Results From At-Home COVID-19 Self-test Kits: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized SARS-CoV-2 rapid at-home self-test kits for individuals with and without symptoms. How appropriately users interpret and act on the results of at-home COVID-19 self-tests is unknown.
Objective: To assess how users of at-home COVID-19 self-test kits interpret and act on results when given instructions authorized by the FDA, instructions based on decision science principles, or no instructions.
Design, setting, and participants: A randomized clinical trial was conducted of 360 adults in the US who were recruited in April 2021 to complete an online survey on their interpretation of at-home COVID-19 self-test results. Participants were given 1 of 3 instruction types and were presented with 1 of 4 risk scenarios. Participants were paid $5 and had a median survey completion time of 8.7 minutes. Data analyses were performed from June to July 2021.
Intervention: Participants were randomized to receiving either the FDA-authorized instructions (authorized), the intervention instructions (intervention), or no instructions (control), and to 1 of 4 scenarios: 3 with a high pretest probability of infection (COVID-19 symptoms and/or a close contact with COVID-19) and 1 with low pretest probability (no symptoms and no contact). The intervention instructions were designed using decision science principles.
Main outcomes and measures: Proportion of participants in the high pretest probability scenarios choosing to quarantine per federal recommendations and perceived probabilities of infection given a negative or positive COVID-19 test result. A Bonferroni correction accounted for multiple comparisons (3 instruction types × 4 scenarios; α = 0.004).
Results: After excluding 22 individuals who completed the survey too quickly, the responses of 338 participants (median [IQR] age, 38 [31 to 48] years; 154 (46%) women; 215 (64%) with a college degree or higher) were included in the study analysis. Given a positive test result, 95% (322 of 338; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.97) of the total participants appropriately chose to quarantine regardless of which instructions they had received. Given a negative test result, participants in the high pretest probability scenarios were more likely to fail to quarantine appropriately with the authorized instructions (33%) than with the intervention (14%; 95% CI for the 19% difference, 6% to 31%; P = .004) or control (24%; 95% CI for the 9% difference, -4% to 23%; P = .02). In the low pretest probability scenario, the proportion choosing unnecessary quarantine was higher with the authorized instructions (31%) than with the intervention (22%; 95% CI for the 9% difference, -14% to 31%) or control (10%; 95% CI for the 21% difference, 0.5% to 41%)-neither comparison was statistically significant (P = .05 and P = .20 respectively).
Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that at-home COVID-19 self-test kit users relying on the authorized instructions may not follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's quarantine recommendations, producing unintended risks and unnecessary disruptions. Redesigned instructions that follow decision science principles may improve compliance.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04758299.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Communicating the Imperfect Diagnostic Accuracy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Self-Tests: An Online Randomized Experiment.Med Decis Making. 2024 May;44(4):437-450. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241242131. Epub 2024 Apr 23. Med Decis Making. 2024. PMID: 38651834 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33115543 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33419461 Free PMC article.
-
Home Sample Self-Collection for COVID-19 Patients.Adv Biosyst. 2020 Nov;4(11):e2000150. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202000150. Epub 2020 Oct 1. Adv Biosyst. 2020. PMID: 33006256 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pivot, persevere, or perish: how Ellume Health overcame development and regulatory obstacles to become the first authorized over-the-counter COVID-19 test in the United States.Lab Chip. 2023 May 16;23(10):2366-2370. doi: 10.1039/d3lc00118k. Lab Chip. 2023. PMID: 37129954 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Natural frequency tree- versus conditional probability formula-based training for medical students' estimation of screening test predictive values: a randomized controlled trial.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1207. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06209-0. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39449124 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Use of At-Home Medical Tests Among Older US Adults: A Nationally Representative Survey.Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241284168. doi: 10.1177/00469580241284168. Inquiry. 2024. PMID: 39311022 Free PMC article.
-
Communicating the Imperfect Diagnostic Accuracy of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Self-Tests: An Online Randomized Experiment.Med Decis Making. 2024 May;44(4):437-450. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241242131. Epub 2024 Apr 23. Med Decis Making. 2024. PMID: 38651834 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Self-tests for COVID-19: What is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023).PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;4(2):e0002336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002336. eCollection 2024. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38324519 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Testing Among People with HIV: A Population Level Analysis Based on Statewide Data in South Carolina.AIDS Behav. 2024 Oct;28(Suppl 1):22-32. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04244-4. Epub 2023 Dec 18. AIDS Behav. 2024. PMID: 38109020
References
-
- US National Institute on Aging . Why COVID-19 testing is the key to getting back to normal. Accessed July 12, 2021. https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/why-covid-19-testing-key-getting-back-normal
-
- US Food and Drug Administration . Coronavirus (COVID-19) update: FDA authorizes first COVID-19 test for self-testing at home. Accessed July 12, 2012. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19...
-
- US Food and Drug Administration . Coronavirus (COVID-19) update: FDA authorizes antigen test as first over-the-counter fully at-home diagnostic test for COVID-19. Accessed July 12, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19...
-
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Interim guidance for antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2. Accessed October 3, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/resources/antigen-tests-gu...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
