Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 1;13(1):609.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28256-1.

A neural circuit linking learning and sleep in Drosophila long-term memory

Affiliations

A neural circuit linking learning and sleep in Drosophila long-term memory

Zhengchang Lei et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Animals retain some but not all experiences in long-term memory (LTM). Sleep supports LTM retention across animal species. It is well established that learning experiences enhance post-learning sleep. However, the underlying mechanisms of how learning mediates sleep for memory retention are not clear. Drosophila males display increased amounts of sleep after courtship learning. Courtship learning depends on Mushroom Body (MB) neurons, and post-learning sleep is mediated by the sleep-promoting ventral Fan-Shaped Body neurons (vFBs). We show that post-learning sleep is regulated by two opposing output neurons (MBONs) from the MB, which encode a measure of learning. Excitatory MBONs-γ2α'1 becomes increasingly active upon increasing time of learning, whereas inhibitory MBONs-β'2mp is activated only by a short learning experience. These MB outputs are integrated by SFS neurons, which excite vFBs to promote sleep after prolonged but not short training. This circuit may ensure that only longer or more intense learning experiences induce sleep and are thereby consolidated into LTM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. vFBs are activated after long but not short courtship experience.
a Mean normalized luminescence traces (±SEM) in vFBs. b Mean normalized luminescence in the 1–3 h time period after training (TP1-3) in a. n0 h = 33, n1 h = 29, n2 h = 37, n4 h = 35, n6 h = 35, P1 h = 0.7824, P2 h = 0.2996, P4 h = 2.9e−5, P6 h = 0.0065 for H0 N. Lum.exp = N. Lum.nai, P = 0.0014 for H0 N. Lum.2 h = N. Lum.4hr, P = 0.6311, for H0 N. Lum.4 h = N. Lum.6 h, two-sided Student T test. c Mean sleep traces of ΔSleep (exp-nai) (±SEM) after training. d Mean ΔSleep (exp-nai) in TP1-3 in c. n0 h = 45, n1 h = 42, n2 h = 41, n4 h = 44, n6 h = 48, P1 h = 0.5480, P2 h = 0.6338, P4 h = 0.0022, P6 h = 1.1e−4 for H0 ΔSleep = 0, two-sided Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, and P = 0.0251 for H0 ΔSleep2 h = ΔSleep4 h, P = 0.4809 for HΔSleep4 h = ΔSleep6 h, two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. e LTM, shown as Suppression Index, SI [%] of males trained as indicated in a. n0 h = 58, n1 h = 60, n2 h = 59, n4 h = 63, n6 h = 60, P1 h = 0.2942, P2 h = 0.3277, P4 h = 0.0022, P6 h = 1.2e−4 for H0 SI = 0, and P = 0.0175 for H0 SI2 h = SI4 h, two-sided Permutation test. f (top) Mean sleep traces of ΔSleep (exp-nai) (±SEM) upon vFBs silencing. (bottom) Mean ΔSleep (exp-nai) in TP1-3 of the data at the top. (left) n20 °C = 57, n30 °C = 59, P20 °C = 1.4e−4, P30 °C = 0.0581 value is for H0 ΔSleep = 0, and P = 2.6e−5 for H0 ΔSleep20 °C = ΔSleep30 °C, (middle) n20 °C = 63, n30 °C = 46, P20 °C = 1.6e−6, P30 °C = 1.4e−6 for H0 ΔSleep = 0, and P = 0.1399 for H0 ΔSleep20 °C = ΔSleep30 °C, (right) n20 °C = 59, n30 °C = 65, P20 °C = 0.0019, P30 °C = 1.3e−9 for H0 ΔSleep = 0, and P = 0.0612 for H0 ΔSleep20 °C = ΔSleep30 °C. Two-sided Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for single groups and two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum test across groups. Full genotypes and data analysis details can be found in Supplementary Tables 1–3. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. ns P > 0.05, *P  <  0.05, **P  <  0.01, ***P  <  0.001. n represents independent fly samples with assays repeated at least 3 times (b, d, e and f). Box plots represent median and IQR and whiskers extend to lower and upper adjacent values (b, d and f).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. MBONs-γ2α’1 activity reflects the length of learning.
a Mean sleep change upon optogenetic activation of MBONs. P value is for H0 ΔSleep(light-nolight) = 0, two-sided Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, n = 36–54 per group (Supplementary Table 3). b Neural skeletons derived from the FIB-SEM Drosophila brain volume. c LTM, shown as Suppression Index, SI [%], upon MBONs-γ2α’1 silencing. n1 = 53 and 51, n2 = 53 and 54, n3 = 44 and 44 for naïve and trained group respectively, P1 = 0.8602, P2 = 0.0003, P3 = 0.0001 for H0 SI = 0, and P12 = 0.0105, P13 = 0.0013 for H0 SIexp = SIctrl, two-sided Permutation test. d (left) Mean sleep traces of ΔSleep (exp-nai) (±SEM) upon MBONs-γ2α’1 silencing. (right) Mean ΔSleep (exp-nai) in the 1–3 h time period after training (TP1-3) on the left. (top) n20 °C = 70, n30 °C = 46, P20 °C = 5.3e−8, P30 °C = 0.9608 for H0 ΔSleep = 0, and P = 3.9e−6 for H0 ΔSleep20 °C = ΔSleep30 °C. (bottom) n20 °C = 68, n30 °C = 69, P20 °C = 0.0065, P30 °C = 0.0002 for H0 ΔSleep = 0, and P = 0.2388 for H0 ΔSleep20 °C = ΔSleep30 °C. Two-sided Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for single groups and two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum test across groups. e Mean GCaMP6s response (ΔF/F) traces (±SEM) in vFBs (top), dFBs (middle) upon optogenetic activation of MBONs-γ2α’1 (red bar) or in vFBs (bottom) upon MBONs-calyx activation (red bar). ntop = 7, nmiddle = 4, nbottom = 7, Ptop = 1.0e−5, Pmiddle = 0.6254, Pbotton = 0.4812, for H0 ΔF/F = 0, two-sided Student T test. f Normalized mean luminescence traces (±SEM). g Mean normalized luminescence in TP1-3 in f. n0 h = 73, n1 h = 84, n2 h = 50, n4 h = 61, n6 h = 67, P1 h = 0.1476, P2 h = 0.0214, P4 h = 7.7e−4, P6 h = 8.0e−8 for H0 N. Lum.exp = N. Lum.nai, P = 0.0068 for H0 N. Lum.1hr = N. Lum.4 h, and P = 0.0050 for H0 N. Lum.2 h = N. Lum.6 h, two-sided Student T test. Full genotypes and data analysis details in Supplementary Tables 1–3. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. ns P > 0.05, *P  <  0.05, **P  <  0.01, ***P  <  0.001. n represents independent fly samples with assays repeated at least 3 times (a, c, d and g). Box plots represent median and IQR, whiskers extend to lower and upper adjacent values and red crosses for outliers (a, d and g).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. MBONs-β’2mp activity peaks after short training.
a Neural skeletons derived from the FIB-SEM Drosophila brain volume. b Mean GCaMP6s response (ΔF/F) traces (±SEM) in vFBs upon optogenetic MBONs-β’2mp activation (red bar). n = 5 flies per group, Pleft = 0.0303, Pright = 0.0071 for H0 ΔF/F = 0, two-sided Student T test. c. Normalized mean luminescence traces (±SEM). d. Mean normalized luminescence in the 1–3 h time period (TP1-3) after training in c. n0 h = 47, n1 h = 38, n2 h = 39, n4 h = 44, n6 h = 38, P1 h = 0.2769, P2 h = 0.0056, P4 h = 0.1043, P6 h = 0.8331 for H0 N. Lum.exp = N. Lum.nai, and P = 8.6e−4 for H0 N. Lum.2 h = N. Lum.6 h, two-sided Student T test. e Mean sleep traces (±SEM) of ΔSleep (exp-nai) upon MBONs-β’2mp silencing. f Mean ΔSleep (exp-nai) in TP1-3 in e. n1 = 54, n2 = 49, n3 = 39, n4 = 42, P1 = 0.6073, P2 = 0.0207, P3 = 0.3553, P4 = 0.3451 for H0 ΔSleep = 0, two-sided Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, and P12 = 0.0273, P34 = 0.3559 for H0 ΔSleep20 °C = ΔSleep30 °C, two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. g LTM, shown as SI [%] upon MBONs-β’2mp silencing. n1 = 53 and 52, n2 = 59 and 61, n3 = 52 and 57, n4 = 72 and 59 for naïve and trained group respectively, P1 = 0.2188, P2 = 0.0019, P3 = 0.4019, P4 = 0.2663 for H0 SI = 0, and P12 = 0.0376, P34 = 0.8575 for H0 SIexp = SIctrl, two-sided Permutation test. h Mean ΔSleep (exp-nai) in TP1-3 upon MBONs-β’2mp activation. n1 = 40, n2 = 40, n3 = 40, n4 = 38, P1 = 0.0025, P2 = 0.6374, P3 = 0.0014, P4 = 1.2e−5 for H0 ΔSleep = 0, two-sided Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, and P12 = 0.0023, P34 = 0.8768 for H0 ΔSleepnoact = ΔSleepact, two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. i LTM, shown as SI [%], upon MBONs-β’2 mp activation. n1 = 56 and 57, n2 = 57 and 56, n3 = 30 and 40, n4 = 33 and 37 for naïve and trained group respectively, P1 = 1.0e−5, P2 = 0.0517, P3 = 4.8e−4, P4 = 1.0e−5 for H0 SI = 0, and P12 = 0.0403, P34 = 0.9542 for H0 SIexp = SIctrl, two-sided Permutation test. Full genotypes and data analysis details in Supplementary Tables 1–3. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. ns P > 0.05, *P < 0.05, **P  <  0.01, ***P < 0.001. n represents independent fly samples with assays repeated at least 3 times (d, f, g, h and i). Box plots represent median and IQR, whiskers extend to lower and upper adjacent values and red crosses for outliers (d, f and h).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. SFSs integrate MBONs-γ2α’1 and MBONs-β’2mp inputs onto vFBs.
a Neural skeletons derived from the FIB-SEM Drosophila brain volume. b Confocal image of SFSs expression pattern extracted from the Multi Color Flip-Out (MCFO) of the VT033828-GAL4 line. Scale bar = 50 μm. (Details in the Methods). c, d Traces of mean GCaMP6s responses (ΔF/F) (±SEM) in SFSs upon optogenetic activation (red bar) of MBONs-γ2α’1 (c, n = 9, P = 0.048), MBONs-β’2mp (d, n = 5, P = 0.0002). P value is for H0 ΔF/F = 0, two-sided Student T test. e. Traces of mean GCaMP6s responses (ΔF/F) (±SEM) in vFBs upon SFSs focal activation (red bar). n = 6, P = 0.0075 H0 ΔF/F = 0, two-sided Student T test. f. Mean ΔSleep (exp-nai) in the 1–3 h time period after training (TP1-3) upon SFSs silencing. n = 39 flies per group, P1 = 0.0046, P2 = 0.1208, P3 = 1.1e−4, P4 = 0.0445 for H0 ΔSleep = 0, two-sided Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, and P12 = 0.0091, P34 = 0.2711 for H0 ΔSleep20 °C = ΔSleep30 °C, two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. g LTM, shown as SI [%], after SFSs silencing in TP1-3. n1 = 52 and 52, n2 = 61 and 64, n3 = 62 and 51, n4 = 65 and 62 for naïve and trained group respectively, P1 = 1.0e−5, P2 = 0.4976, P3 = 0.0028, P4 = 2.0e−4 for H0 SI = 0, and P12 = 0.0115, P34 = 0.7954 for H0 SIexp = SIctrl; two-sided Permutation test. h Mean calcium traces (±SEM) in SFSs, measured for 1 min at multiple time points spanning TP1-3. i Mean calcium levels in TP1-3 in h. n0 h = 28, n1 h = 17, n2 h = 18, n4 h = 19, n6 h = 26, P1 h = 0.3431, P2 h = 0.6126, P4 h = 0.0312, P6 h = 0.0131 for H0 Fnai = Fexp, P = 0.0466 for H0 F2 h = F4 h, and P = 0.8225 for H0 F4 h = F6 h, two-sided Student T test. j Model of the circuit mechanism to generate post-learning sleep for LTM consolidation. Solid lines indicate monosynaptic connections. Full genotypes and data analysis details in Supplementary Tables 1–3. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. ns P > 0.05, *P  <  0.05, **P  <  0.01, ***P  <  0.001. n represents independent fly samples with assays repeated at least 3 times (c, d, e, f, g and i). Box plots represent median and IQR, whiskers extend to lower and upper adjacent values and red crosses for outliers (f and i).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Diekelmann S, Born J. The memory function of sleep. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010;11:114–126. - PubMed
    1. Vorster AP, Born J. Sleep and memory in mammals, birds and invertebrates. Neurosci. Biobehav Rev. 2015;50:103–119. - PubMed
    1. Beyaert L, Greggers U, Menzel R. Honeybees consolidate navigation memory during sleep. J. Exp. Biol. 2012;215:3981–3988. - PubMed
    1. Ganguly-Fitzgerald I, Donlea J, Shaw PJ. Waking experience affects sleep need in Drosophila. Science. 2006;313:1775–1781. - PubMed
    1. Donlea JM, Thimgan MS, Suzuki Y, Gottschalk L, Shaw PJ. Inducing sleep by remote control facilitates memory consolidation in Drosophila. Science. 2011;332:1571–1576. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources