Implementing an electronic health record dashboard for safe anticoagulant management: learning from qualitative interviews with existing and potential users to develop an implementation process
- PMID: 35109916
- PMCID: PMC8812192
- DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00262-w
Implementing an electronic health record dashboard for safe anticoagulant management: learning from qualitative interviews with existing and potential users to develop an implementation process
Erratum in
-
Correction: Implementing an electronic health record dashboard for safe anticoagulant management: learning from qualitative interviews with existing and potential users to develop an implementation process.Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Mar 13;4(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00412-8. Implement Sci Commun. 2023. PMID: 36915186 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Facilitating appropriate care delivery using electronic health record (digital health) tools is increasing. However, frequently used determinants frameworks seldom address key barriers for technology-associated implementation.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in two contexts: the national Veterans Health Affairs (VA) following implementation of an electronic dashboard, a population health tool, and the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) prior to implementation of a similar electronic dashboard. The dashboard is designed for pharmacist or nurse use to monitor safe outpatient anticoagulant prescribing by physicians and other clinicians We performed rapid qualitative inquiry analysis and selected implementation strategies. Through a stakeholder focus group session, we selected implementation strategies to address determinants and facilitate implementation in the MAQI2 sites.
Results: Among 45 interviewees (32 in VA, 13 in MAQI2), we identified five key determinants of implementation success: (1) clinician authority and autonomy, (2) clinician self-identity and job satisfaction, (3) documentation and administrative needs, (4) staffing and work schedule, and (5) integration with existing information systems. Key differences between the two contexts included concerns about information technology support and prioritization within MAQI2 (prior to implementation) but not VA (after implementation) and concerns about authority and autonomy that differed between the VA (higher baseline levels, more concerns) and MAQI2 (lower baseline levels, less concern).
Conclusions: The successful implementation of electronic health record tools requires unique considerations that differ from other types of implementation, must account for the status of implementation, and should address the effects of the tool deployment on clinical staff authority and autonomy. Interviewing both post-implementation and pre-implementation users can provide a robust understanding of implementation determinants.
Keywords: Anticoagulation; Implementation; Pharmacist; Population health.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Barnes discloses consulting fees from Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squibb and Janssen. Dr. Dorsch is supported by R18 HS026874 and R21 HS026322 from the Agency for Health Research and Quality, R01 AG062582 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Aging, and the American Health Association Health IT Research Network; has received honoraria from Janssen; and has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer and Amgen in the past 2 years. The other authors have no disclosures. The authors declare that Anne Sales is co-Editor-in-Chief of the journal.
Similar articles
-
Role of Individual Clinician Authority in the Implementation of Informatics Tools for Population-Based Medication Management: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Oct 24;10:e49025. doi: 10.2196/49025. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023. PMID: 37874636 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Evidence Brief: Comparative Effectiveness of Appointment Recall Reminder Procedures for Follow-up Appointments [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2015 Jul. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2015 Jul. PMID: 27606388 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Physicians' Perspectives Regarding Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use Within the Department of Veterans Affairs: a Multi-State Qualitative Study.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1253-1259. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4374-1. Epub 2018 Mar 8. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29520747 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Patient perceptions of an electronic-health-record-based rheumatoid arthritis outcomes dashboard: a mixed-methods study.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 12;24(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02696-9. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024. PMID: 39395970 Free PMC article.
-
Using the technology acceptance model to assess clinician perceptions and experiences with a rheumatoid arthritis outcomes dashboard: qualitative study.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 May 27;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02530-2. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024. PMID: 38802865 Free PMC article.
-
Visions for digital integrated cardiovascular care: HRS Digital Health Committee perspectives.Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2024 Feb 24;5(2):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.02.003. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2024. PMID: 38765620 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Digital transformation of an academic hospital department: A case study on strategic planning using the balanced scorecard.PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Nov 17;2(11):e0000385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000385. eCollection 2023 Nov. PLOS Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 37976272 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Individual Clinician Authority in the Implementation of Informatics Tools for Population-Based Medication Management: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Oct 24;10:e49025. doi: 10.2196/49025. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023. PMID: 37874636 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allen AL, Lucas J, Parra D, Spoutz P, Kibert JL, Ragheb B, et al. Shifting the paradigm: a population health approach to the management of direct oral anticoagulants. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021:e022758 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796718. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, Antz M, Diener HC, Hacke W, et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-Vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17:1467–1507. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv309. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur Heart J. 2021;42:373–498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
