Non-weight-bearing short knee radiographs to evaluate coronal alignment before total knee arthroplasty

Sheng Pan; Chaoran Huang; Xingchen Zhang; Ruxin Ruan; Ziwen Yan; Zheng Li; Yong Pang; Kaijin Guo; Xin Zheng

doi:10.21037/qims-21-400

Non-weight-bearing short knee radiographs to evaluate coronal alignment before total knee arthroplasty

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Feb;12(2):1214-1222. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-400.

Authors

Sheng Pan¹, Chaoran Huang¹, Xingchen Zhang¹, Ruxin Ruan¹, Ziwen Yan¹, Zheng Li¹, Yong Pang¹, Kaijin Guo¹, Xin Zheng^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
² Department of Orthopedics, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Abstract

Background: Whole leg radiograph (WLR) is the gold standard in assessing lower limb alignment before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) although in practice, non-weight-bearing short knee radiographs (NWB SKRs) are used by most medical institutions. The objective of this study was to determine whether the femorotibial angle (FTA) could be used to evaluate lower limb alignment on limited NWB SKRs. We also investigated whether FTA alignment measurements on NWB SKRs and WLRs differed depending on the direction of knee deformity.

Methods: In all, 105 knees which underwent both NWB SKR and WLR were included. Measurement of hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was obtained through WLR, while the FTA was found using NWB SKR (FTA_SKR) and WLR (FTA_WLR). All knees were divided into three groups based on the HKA. The Kappa statistic was used to compare the agreement of categorical alignment variables between the HKA and FTA_SKR. The agreement of the measurements obtained from the two radiographs was made using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Pearson correlation coefficient and simple linear regression analysis were also conducted to evaluate the correlation between different angles.

Results: The agreement for categories of lower limb deformity was rated excellent (kappa =0.804, P<0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean difference for the FTA_SKR and FTA_WLR was 4.4°. There was an excellent correlation (r=0.861, P<0.001) and good reliability (ICC, 0.607) between the FTA_SKR and HKA. For the varus group, there was a good correlation between the FTA_SKR and HKA (r=0.650, P<0.001); however, there were no significant correlations between the FTAS KR and HKA in the neutral (r=0.106, P=0.543) and valgus groups (r=0.322, P=0.102).

Conclusions: For outpatient follow-up, we found that the FTA on NWB SKRs is an acceptable means for classifying knee alignment (varus, neutral, or valgus). The measurement on NWB SKR also showed excellent correlation and good agreement with the HKA. For varus knees, NWB SKR measurements showed the best correlation with the HKA. However, for neutral and valgus knees, NWB SKR measurements were insufficient for conducting a reliable calculation and quantification of coronal alignment of the lower limb.

Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA); coronal alignment; femorotibial angle (FTA); mechanical axis; osteoarthritis (OA); short knee radiograph; whole leg radiograph (WLR).