Risk of Sterilization Regret and Age: An Analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2015-2019
- PMID: 35115436
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004692
Risk of Sterilization Regret and Age: An Analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2015-2019
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the risk of sterilization regret based on age at the time of sterilization in a contemporary group of women.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2015-2017 and 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, Female Respondent Files, to estimate the proportion of women who experience sterilization regret. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the population and the proportion with regret. Sterilization regret was defined as someone who either underwent sterilization reversal or who definitely wanted sterilization reversal. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations with sterilization regret.
Results: A total of 1,549 women who underwent sterilization were included in the analysis; 8% were aged 21-30 years, and 92% were aged older than 30 years. Of the participants, 16.9% identified as Black, 22.0% as Hispanic, and 57.2% as White. Most (58.4%) underwent a tubal sterilization procedure between age 21 and 30 years. The cumulative proportion of regret was 10.2% (12.6% for women who underwent sterilization at age 21-30 years and 6.7% for those who underwent sterilization at older than age 30 years). After controlling for covariates including age, race, parity, educational attainment, and medical reason for sterilization, the only variable that had a statistically significant association with regret was age at the time of the interview (P<.001). As women got older, they were less likely to report sterilization regret.
Conclusion: Younger women experience more sterilization regret. As women get older, sterilization regret decreases. Counseling about sterilization should reveal the unpredictability of future desire, but age alone must not be a barrier to performing sterilization.
Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review.Contraception. 2006 Feb;73(2):205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.08.006. Epub 2005 Oct 21. Contraception. 2006. PMID: 16413851 Review.
-
Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of poststerilization regret in women: an updated international review from an epidemiological perspective.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994 Oct;49(10):722-32. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199410000-00028. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994. PMID: 7816397 Review.
-
Young age a factor in sterilization regret.Contracept Technol Update. 1999 Oct;20(10):116-7. Contracept Technol Update. 1999. PMID: 12322319
-
Sterilization regret among U.S. couples.Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 Sep-Oct;18(5):238-40. Fam Plann Perspect. 1986. PMID: 3803559
-
A comparison of definable traits in women requesting reversal of sterilization and women satisfied with sterilization.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Jan 15;145(2):198-202. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90491-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983. PMID: 6849353
Cited by
-
Non-Hormonal Contraception.J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 20;12(14):4791. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144791. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37510905 Free PMC article. Review.
-
U.S. physicians' perspectives on the complexities and challenges of permanent contraception provision.Contraception. 2023 May;121:109948. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109948. Epub 2023 Jan 11. Contraception. 2023. PMID: 36641099 Free PMC article.
-
A Decision Aid to Support Tubal Sterilization Decision-Making Among Pregnant Women: The MyDecision/MiDecisión Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242215. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2215. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38502127 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Daniels K, Abma JC. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-49: United States, 2017-2019. NCHS Data Brief 2020:1–8.
-
- Messinger LB, Alford CE, Csokmay JM, Henne MB, Mumford SL, Segars JH, et al. Cost and efficacy comparison of in vitro fertilization and tubal anastomosis for women after tubal ligation. Fertil Sterility 2015;104:32–8.e34. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.019 - DOI
-
- Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Tylor LR, Peterson HB. Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:889–95. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00539-0 - DOI
-
- Curtis KM, Mohllajee AP, Peterson HB. Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review. Contraception 2006;73:205–10. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.08.006 - DOI
-
- Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J. Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception 2018;97:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.003 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
