Objective: To identify the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) values that can be used to discriminate the use of a walking aid and the BBS sub-items that reveal the differences in the use of walking aids among hospitalized older adults with a hip fracture.
Methods: The cases of 77 older adults (age 80.8 ± 7.5 years) with a hip fracture who were able to walk independently in the hospital were retrospectively analyzed. A receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis was used to identify BBS scores that optimized the identification of subjects with different levels of aids. The BBS sub-items identifying differing among the walking aids were identified by a classification and regression tree analysis.
Results: The BBS scores were highest for no aid, a cane, and a walker, in that order. The ability to walk without an aid and the ability to walk without a walker showed moderate AUCs (0.824 and 0.865) with cutoff values of 51.5 and 45.5 points, respectively. The sub-items identified were Turning 360° (4 vs. < 4 points) as the best discriminator for using/not using a cane and Stool Stepping (≥ 2 vs. < 2 points) for using a cane or walker.
Conclusion: The BBS is useful for determining whether to discontinue the use of a walker in individuals with a hip fracture.
Keywords: Balance; Berg Balance Scale; hip fracture; older adult; walking aid.