Effectiveness of Face Mask or Respirator Use in Indoor Public Settings for Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infection - California, February-December 2021
- PMID: 35143470
- PMCID: PMC8830622
- DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7106e1
Effectiveness of Face Mask or Respirator Use in Indoor Public Settings for Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infection - California, February-December 2021
Abstract
The use of face masks or respirators (N95/KN95) is recommended to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 (1). Well-fitting face masks and respirators effectively filter virus-sized particles in laboratory conditions (2,3), though few studies have assessed their real-world effectiveness in preventing acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection (4). A test-negative design case-control study enrolled randomly selected California residents who had received a test result for SARS-CoV-2 during February 18-December 1, 2021. Face mask or respirator use was assessed among 652 case-participants (residents who had received positive test results for SARS-CoV-2) and 1,176 matched control-participants (residents who had received negative test results for SARS-CoV-2) who self-reported being in indoor public settings during the 2 weeks preceding testing and who reported no known contact with anyone with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection during this time. Always using a face mask or respirator in indoor public settings was associated with lower adjusted odds of a positive test result compared with never wearing a face mask or respirator in these settings (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.24-0.82). Among 534 participants who specified the type of face covering they typically used, wearing N95/KN95 respirators (aOR = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.05-0.64) or surgical masks (aOR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.13-0.90) was associated with significantly lower adjusted odds of a positive test result compared with not wearing any face mask or respirator. These findings reinforce that in addition to being up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccinations, consistently wearing a face mask or respirator in indoor public settings reduces the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection. Using a respirator offers the highest level of personal protection against acquiring infection, although it is most important to wear a mask or respirator that is comfortable and can be used consistently.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Joseph A. Lewnard discloses receipt of research grants and consulting fees from Pfizer, Inc., unrelated to the current study. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Similar articles
-
Comparing the fit of N95, KN95, surgical, and cloth face masks and assessing the accuracy of fit checking.PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245688. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33481870 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of surgical mask and N95 respirator mask use on cerebrovascular reactivity.Ideggyogy Sz. 2024 Jul 30;77(7-8):263-271. doi: 10.18071/isz.77.0263. Ideggyogy Sz. 2024. PMID: 39082253 English.
-
Comparison of Fit for Sealed and Loose-Fitting Surgical Masks and N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 May 3;65(4):463-474. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa125. Ann Work Expo Health. 2021. PMID: 33458738 Free PMC article.
-
P2/N95 respirators & surgical masks to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection: Effectiveness & adverse effects.Infect Dis Health. 2022 May;27(2):81-95. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 20. Infect Dis Health. 2022. PMID: 35151628 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Masks or N95 Respirators During COVID-19 Pandemic-Which One Should I Wear?J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec;78(12):2114-2127. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.08.024. Epub 2020 Aug 27. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32926868 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A modeling study on SARS-CoV-2 transmissions in primary and middle schools in Illinois.BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):3197. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20623-5. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39558201 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and feasibility of a novel semi-facial respirator with chitosan nanoparticles on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare professionals: randomized controlled trial.BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1061. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09966-x. BMC Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 39333902 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Longitudinal assessment of the impact of COVID-19 infection on mask-wearing behaviors.BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;24(1):2230. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19776-0. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39152377 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19: did the masks work?Future Microbiol. 2024;19(11):997-1002. doi: 10.1080/17460913.2024.2343558. Epub 2024 May 24. Future Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39109652
-
Differential effectiveness of COVID-19 health behaviors: The role of mental health conditions in mask-wearing, social distancing, and hygiene practice.Health Care Sci. 2023 Jul 16;2(4):286-290. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.60. eCollection 2023 Aug. Health Care Sci. 2023. PMID: 38939519 Free PMC article.
References
-
- CDC. Science brief: community use of cloth masks to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/masking...
-
- Pan J, Harb C, Leng W, Marr LC. Inward and outward effectiveness of cloth masks, a surgical mask, and a face shield. Aerosol Sci Technol 2021;55:718–33. 10.1080/02786826.2021.1890687 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
