Introduction: Studies evaluating outcomes in bladder cancer sub stratified into T2a and T2b pathologic staging have demonstrated inconsistent results. Survival outcomes in a cohort of pure urothelial carcinoma patient undergoing radical cystectomy were evaluated to determine the prognostic value of T2 sub staging.
Methods: Using our prospectively maintained institutional cystectomy database, we identified patients with pure urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, either pT2aN0 or pT2bN0. We excluded any patients with variant histology, patients that underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and patients that had margin positive disease. Demographic and clinicopathologic data were collected, and Cox proportional hazard regression assessed overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and recurrence free survival (RFS).
Results: From 2001 to 2019, we identified 1,929 patients that underwent radical cystectomy, 61 patients had pT2a and 65 had pT2b pure urothelial carcinoma that met inclusion criteria. Only age (P = 0.02) and the initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor pathology (P < 0.01) were notably different when comparing the clinical characteristics of patients with pT2a and pT2b. No differences were noted in OS, CSS, or RFS between the 2 groups on Kaplan-Meier analysis. On univariate Cox regression analysis, age, TURBT stage, cystectomy pathology stage, carcinoma in situ, and lymphovascular invasion status, and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy status was not found to be significant factors for OS, CSS, or RFS between patients with pT2aN0 or pT2bN0 tumors.
Conclusion: Prior studies have sub stratified pT2a and pT2b, studying survival outcomes with equivocal results. Many of these studies included variant histology or use of chemotherapy in the analysis. Here, we identified a pure urothelial cohort to compare survival outcomes between pT2a and pT2b and found no difference in OS, CSS, and RFS.
Keywords: Muscle invasive bladder cancer; Survival outcomes; Urothelial carcinoma.
Published by Elsevier Inc.