Cognitive Restructuring Before Versus After Exposure: Effect on Expectancy and Outcome in Individuals With Claustrophobia

Behav Modif. 2022 Nov;46(6):1432-1459. doi: 10.1177/01454455221075754. Epub 2022 Feb 12.

Abstract

Maximizing the discrepancy between expected and actual outcomes during exposure (i.e., expectancy violation) is thought to optimize inhibitory learning. The current study examined Craske et al.'s suggestion that engaging in cognitive restructuring (CR) before exposure prematurely reduces expectancy and mitigates outcomes. Participants (N = 93) with claustrophobia were randomly assigned to either 15 minutes of CR before exposure (CR Before) or 15 minutes of CR after exposure (CR After). Although the CR Before condition experienced greater expectancy reduction before exposure than the CR After condition, both groups experienced similar overall expectancy reduction by the end of the intervention. Groups experienced similar gains, with large significant improvement at posttreatment and follow-up. Results suggest that both cognitive therapy and exposure therapy lead to expectancy reduction, but that the order of these interventions does not impact outcome. Clinicaltrials.org registration #NCT03628105.

Keywords: cognitive behavior therapy; cognitive restructuring; expectancy; expectancy violation; exposure therapy; inhibitory learning model.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy* / methods
  • Cognitive Restructuring
  • Humans
  • Implosive Therapy*
  • Learning
  • Phobic Disorders*

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03628105

Grants and funding