Identifying Predictive Bacterial Markers from Cervical Swab Microbiota on Pregnancy Outcome in Woman Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies
- PMID: 35160131
- PMCID: PMC8836651
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030680
Identifying Predictive Bacterial Markers from Cervical Swab Microbiota on Pregnancy Outcome in Woman Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies
Abstract
Background and aims: Failure of the embryo to implant causes about three-fourths of lost pregnancies. Female genital tract microbiota has been associated to Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) outcomes. The objective of this study was to analyze the microbiota of human cervical swab and to correlate these findings with the ART outcomes.
Materials and methods: In this study, 88 cervical swabs were collected from women undergoing ART cycles, with various causes of infertility, at the beginning of the ART protocols. After microbial DNA extraction, V3-V4 variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform. PEnalized LOgistic Regression Analysis (PELORA) was performed to identify clusters of bacterial populations with differential abundances between patients with unfavorable and favorable pregnancy outcome groups, respectively.
Results: We identified a core of microorganisms at lower taxonomic levels that were predictive of women's pregnancy outcomes. Statistically significant differences were identified at species levels with Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus rhamnosus among others. Moreover the abundance of Lactobacillus crispatus and iners, respectively increased and decreased in favorable group as compared to unfavorable group, resulted within the core of microorganisms associated to positive ART outcome. Although the predominance of lactobacilli is generally considered to be advantageous for ART outcome, we found that also the presence of Bifidobacterium (together with the other lactobacilli) was more abundant in the favorable group.
Discussion: Cervix is colonized by microorganisms which can play a role in ART outcomes as seen by an overall decrease in embryo attachment rates and pregnancy rates in both fertile and infertile women. If confirmed in a larger cohort, the abundance of these bacteria can be useful not only as a marker of unfavorable pregnancy outcome but also they may open the way to new interventional strategies based on genital tract microbiota manipulation in order to increase the pregnancy rates in woman undergoing assisted reproductive technologies.
Keywords: assisted reproduction technology; biomarkers; microbiota; pregnancy outcome.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Impact of the Female Genital Microbiota on the Outcome of Assisted Reproduction Treatments.Microorganisms. 2023 May 30;11(6):1443. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061443. Microorganisms. 2023. PMID: 37374945 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of the Cervical Microbiota With Pregnancy Outcome in a Subfertile Population Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Case-Control Study.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Sep 23;11:654202. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.654202. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 34631595 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):684-703. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075. Epub 2016 Oct 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27717732
-
Vaginal Microbiome of Pregnant Indian Women: Insights into the Genome of Dominant Lactobacillus Species.Microb Ecol. 2020 Aug;80(2):487-499. doi: 10.1007/s00248-020-01501-0. Epub 2020 Mar 23. Microb Ecol. 2020. PMID: 32206831
-
[Assessment of genital microbiota: An emerging approach in assisted reproductive techniques].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Mar;49(3):185-192. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 3. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021. PMID: 32758671 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Genomic and metabonomic methods reveal the probiotic functions of swine-derived Ligilactobacillus salivarius.BMC Microbiol. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02993-9. BMC Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37648978 Free PMC article.
-
Bifidobacteria in disease: from head to toe.Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2024 Feb;69(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12223-023-01087-3. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2024. PMID: 37644256 Review.
-
Vaginal microbioma and the presence of Lactobacillus spp. as interferences in female fertility: A review system.JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023 Sep 12;27(3):496-506. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20230006. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023. PMID: 37417853 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Age- and endometrial microbiota-related delay in development of endometrial receptivity.Reprod Med Biol. 2023 Jun 27;22(1):e12523. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12523. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2023. PMID: 37383030 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of the Female Genital Microbiota on the Outcome of Assisted Reproduction Treatments.Microorganisms. 2023 May 30;11(6):1443. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061443. Microorganisms. 2023. PMID: 37374945 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Flaviani F., Hezelgrave N.L., Kanno T., Prosdocimi E.M., Chin-Smith E., Ridout A.E., von Maydell D.K., Mistry V., Wade W.G., Shennan A.H., et al. Cervicovaginal microbiota and metabolome predict preterm birth risk in an ethnically diverse cohort. JCI Insight. 2021;6:e149257. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.149257. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
