This article briefly reviews the advantages and limitations of currently available methods for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Clinical evaluation alone is inadequate but still useful in assessing the need for further testing. The medical history, especially the detection of risk factors for DVT, is as important as the physical examination. Confirmation by objective diagnostic tests is essential. Venography has been the traditional standard for determining the optimal management of DVT, but has significant limitations which are not widely appreciated. Noninvasive diagnostic methods for DVT are essential for effective management, but the optimal method for a particular hospital depends on the personnel and resources available.