Content and Actionability of Recommendations to Providers After Shadow Coaching
- PMID: 35170583
- PMCID: PMC9376188
- DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000354
Content and Actionability of Recommendations to Providers After Shadow Coaching
Abstract
Background and objectives: Health care organizations track patient experience data, identify areas of improvement, monitor provider performance, and assist providers in improving their interactions with patients. Some practices use one-on-one provider counseling ("shadow coaching") to identify and modify provider behaviors. A recent evaluation of a large shadow coaching program found statistically significant improvements in coached providers' patient experience scores immediately after being coached. This study aimed to examine the content of the recommendations given to those providers aimed at improving provider-patient interactions, characterize these recommendations, and examine their actionability.
Methods: Providers at a large, urban federally qualified health center were selected for coaching based on Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) patient experience scores (92 of 320 providers), shadowed by a trained peer coach for a half to full day and received recommendations on how to improve interactions with their patients. We coded 1082 recommendations found in the 92 coaching reports.
Results: Reports contained an average of 12 recommendations. About half encouraged consistency of existing behaviors and half encouraged new behaviors. Most recommendations related to behaviors of the provider rather than support staff and targeted actions within the examination room rather than other spaces (eg, waiting room). The most common recommendations mapped to behavioral aspects of provider communication. Most recommendations targeted verbal rather than nonverbal communication behaviors. Most recommendations were actionable (ie, specific, descriptive), with recommendations that encouraged new behaviors being more actionable than those that encouraged existing actions.
Conclusions: Patient experience surveys are effective at identifying where improvement is needed but are not always informative enough to instruct providers on how to modify and improve their interactions with patients. Analyzing the feedback given to coached providers as part of an effective shadow-coaching program provides details about implementation on shadow-coaching feedback. Recommendations to providers aimed at improving their interactions with patients need to not only suggest the exact behaviors defined within patient experience survey items but also include recommended behaviors indirectly associated with those measured behaviors. Attention needs to be paid to supplementing patient experience data with explicit, tangible, and descriptive (ie, actionable) recommendations associated with the targeted, measured behaviors. Research is needed to understand how recommendations are put into practice by providers and what motivates and supports them to sustain changed behaviors.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Shadow Coaching Improves Patient Experience for English-Preferring Patients but not for Spanish-Preferring Patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Aug;38(11):2494-2500. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08045-2. Epub 2023 Feb 16. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 36797540 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Comments on the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Survey Reflect Improvements in Provider Behaviors From Coaching.J Healthc Manag. 2023 Jul-Aug 01;68(4):251-267. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-22-00140. Epub 2023 Jun 19. J Healthc Manag. 2023. PMID: 37326612 Free PMC article.
-
Shadow Coaching Improves Patient Experience With Care, But Gains Erode Later.Med Care. 2021 Nov 1;59(11):950-960. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001629. Med Care. 2021. PMID: 34387621 Free PMC article.
-
Improving patient experience in primary care: a multimethod programme of research on the measurement and improvement of patient experience.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Apr. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Apr. PMID: 28654227 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Use of CAHPS® patient experience survey data as part of a patient-centered medical home quality improvement initiative.J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Jul 7;7:41-54. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S69963. eCollection 2015. J Healthc Leadersh. 2015. PMID: 29355183 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Shadow Coaching Improves Patient Experience for English-Preferring Patients but not for Spanish-Preferring Patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Aug;38(11):2494-2500. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08045-2. Epub 2023 Feb 16. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 36797540 Free PMC article.
-
Summary of the 2020 AHRQ research meeting on 'advancing methods of implementing and evaluating patient experience improvement using consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (CAHPS®) surveys'.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Sep;22(6):883-890. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2064848. Epub 2022 May 5. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022. PMID: 35510496 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wolf JA. Patient experience: The new heart of healthcare leadership. Front Health Serv Manage 2017;33(3):3–16. - PubMed
-
- Berwick DM. A user's manual for the iom's 'quality chasm' report. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(3):80–90. - PubMed
-
- Patwardhan A, Spencer. Are patient surveys valuable as a service-improvement tool in health services? An overview. J Healthc Leadersh 2012.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
