Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;130(2):25002.
doi: 10.1289/EHP10359. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Current Breast Milk PFAS Levels in the United States and Canada: After All This Time, Why Don't We Know More?

Affiliations

Current Breast Milk PFAS Levels in the United States and Canada: After All This Time, Why Don't We Know More?

Judy S LaKind et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Despite 20 y of biomonitoring studies of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in both serum and urine, we have an extremely limited understanding of PFAS concentrations in breast milk of women from the United States and Canada. The lack of robust information on PFAS concentrations in breast milk and implications for breastfed infants and their families were brought to the forefront by communities impacted by PFAS contamination.

Objectives: The objectives of this work are to: a) document published PFAS breast milk concentrations in the United States and Canada; b) estimate breast milk PFAS levels from maternal serum concentrations in national surveys and communities impacted by PFAS; and c) compare measured/estimated milk PFAS concentrations to screening values.

Methods: We used three studies reporting breast milk concentrations in the United States and Canada We also estimated breast milk PFAS concentrations by multiplying publicly available serum concentrations by milk:serum partitioning ratios for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA). Measured and estimated breast milk concentrations were compared to children's drinking water screening values.

Discussion: Geometric means of estimated breast milk concentrations ranged over approximately two orders of magnitude for the different surveys/communities. All geometric mean and mean estimated and measured breast milk PFOA and PFOS concentrations exceeded drinking water screening values for children, sometimes by more than two orders of magnitude. For PFHxS and PFNA, all measured breast milk levels were below the drinking water screening values for children; the geometric mean estimated breast milk concentrations were close to-or exceeded-the children's drinking water screening values for certain communities. Exceeding a children's drinking water screening value does not indicate that adverse health effects will occur and should not be interpreted as a reason to not breastfeed; it indicates that the situation should be further evaluated. It is past time to have a better understanding of environmental chemical transfer to-and concentrations in-an exceptional source of infant nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10359.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

The figure is a set of four horizontal bar graphs titled perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorooctane sulfonate, perfluorohexane sulfonate, and perfluorononanoic acid, plotting Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase h, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase g, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase f, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase e, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase d, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase c, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase c, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase b, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase a, Hoosick Falls, New York, Canadian Health Measures Survey 2016 to 2017, National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey 2017 to 2018, Zheng et al. 2021, Tao et al. 2008, and Kubwabo et al. 2013; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase h, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase g, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase f, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase e, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase d, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase c, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase c, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase b, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase a, Hoosick Falls, New York, Canadian Health Measures Survey 2016 to 2017, National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey 2017 to 2018, Zheng et al. 2021, and Tao et al. 2008; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase h, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase g, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase f, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase e, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase d, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase c, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase c, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase b, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase a, Hoosick Falls, New York, Canadian Health Measures Survey 2016 to 2017, National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey 2017 to 2018, Zheng et al. 2021, and Tao et al. 2008; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase h, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase g, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase f, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase e, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase d, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase c, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase c, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase b, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry location uppercase a, Hoosick Falls, New York, Canadian Health Measures Survey 2016 to 2017, National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey 2017 to 2018, Zheng et al. 2021, and Tao et al. 2008 (y-axis) across Estimated or measured breast milk concentration open parenthesis picogram per milliliter close parenthesis, ranging from 1 to 10 in increments of 9, 10 to 100 in increments of 90, 100 to 1000 in increments of 900, 1000 to 10000 in increments of 9000, and 10000 to 100000 in increments of 90000 (x-axis), respectively.
Figure 1.
Measured (white bars) and estimated (gray bars) breast milk concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the United States and Canada, in comparison with children’s drinking water screening values (dotted line). Bars represent the mean measured breast milk levels for the data from Kubwabo et al. (2013) and Tao et al. (2008), the median measured breast milk levels from Zheng et al. (2021), the geometric mean estimated breast milk levels for National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES), Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS), and PFAS-contaminated communities (as reported in Table 1). Error bars represent maximum measured concentrations in Kubwabo et al. (2013) and Tao et al. (2008), and 95th percentile of estimated concentrations for NHANES, CHMS, and PFAS-contaminated sites. Of note, PFOS, PFHxS, and PFNA were not detected in milk samples from Kubwabo et al. (2013). The x-axis is log-scale. n values are given in Table 1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry children’s drinking water screening values: PFOA (21 ppt), PFOS (14 ppt), PFHxS (140 ppt), and PFNA (21 ppt) (ATSDR 2018).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics). 2012. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 129(3):e827–e841, PMID: , 10.1542/peds.2011-3552. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews DQ, Naidenko OV. 2020. Population-wide exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from drinking water in the United States. Environ Sci Technol Lett 7(12):931–936.
    1. Armbruster DA, Pry T. 2008. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin Biochem Rev (suppl 1):S49–S52, PMID: . - PMC - PubMed
    1. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2018. ATSDR’s Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) and Environmental Media Evaluation Guides (EMEGs) for PFAS. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/resources/mrl-pfas.html [accessed 21 May 2021].
    1. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2021. Toxicological Profile for Perfluoroalkyls. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp200.pdf [accessed 21 May 2021].

Publication types