Pelvic incidence significance relative to spinopelvic risk factors for total hip arthroplasty instability

Bone Joint J. 2022 Mar;104-B(3):352-358. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B3.BJJ-2021-0894.R1.

Abstract

Aims: Pelvic incidence (PI) is a position-independent spinopelvic parameter traditionally used by spinal surgeons to determine spinal alignment. Its relevance to the arthroplasty surgeon in assessing patient risk for total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability preoperatively is unclear. This study was undertaken to investigate the significance of PI relative to other spinopelvic parameter risk factors for instability to help guide its clinical application.

Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed of a multicentre THA database of 9,414 patients with preoperative imaging (dynamic spinopelvic radiographs and pelvic CT scans). Several spinopelvic parameter measurements were made by engineers using advanced software including sacral slope (SS), standing anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPT), spinopelvic tilt (SPT), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI. Lumbar flexion (LF) was determined by change in LL between standing and flexed-seated lateral radiographs. Abnormal pelvic mobility was defined as ∆SPT ≥ 20° between standing and flexed-forward positions. Sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) was defined as PI-LL mismatch > 10°.

Results: PI showed a positive correlation with parameters of SS, SPT, and LL (r-value range 0.468 to 0.661). Patients with a higher PI value showed higher degrees of standing LL, likely as a compensatory measure to maintain sagittal spine balance. There was a positive correlation between LL and LF such that patients with less standing LL had decreased LF (r = 0.49). Similarly, there was a positive correlation between increased SSD and decreased LF (r = 0.54). PI in isolation did not show any significant correlation with lumbar (r = 0.04) or pelvic mobility (r = 0.02). The majority of patients (range 89.4% to 94.2%) had normal lumbar and pelvic mobility regardless of the PI value.

Conclusion: The PI value alone is not indicative of either spinal or pelvic mobility, and thus in isolation may not be a risk factor for THA instability. Patients with SSD had higher rates of spinopelvic stiffness, which may be the mechanism by which PI relates to THA instability risk, but further clinical studies are required. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(3):352-358.

Keywords: CT scans; Dislocation; Instability; Measurements; PI and LL; Pelvic incidence; Radiographs; Spinal sagittal deformity; Spinopelvic mobility; Spinopelvic parameters; Stiffness; Total hip arthroplasty; arthroplasty surgeons; lumbar lordosis; pelvic incidence; spinal deformities; spinopelvic parameters; spinopelvic tilt; total hip arthroplasty instability.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pelvic Bones / anatomy & histology
  • Pelvic Bones / diagnostic imaging*
  • Posture*
  • Prosthesis Failure*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Sacrum / anatomy & histology
  • Sacrum / diagnostic imaging*
  • Young Adult