Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Mar 4;17(3):e0264444.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264444. eCollection 2022.

Don't you tweet me badly: Anxiety contagion between leaders and followers in computer-mediated communication during COVID-19

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Observational Study

Don't you tweet me badly: Anxiety contagion between leaders and followers in computer-mediated communication during COVID-19

Dritjon Gruda et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Do organizational leaders' tweets influence their employees' anxiety? And if so, have employees become more susceptible to their leader's social media communications during the COVID-19 pandemic? Based on emotional contagion and using machine learning algorithms to track anxiety and personality traits of 197 leaders and 958 followers across 79 organizations over 316 days, we find that during the pandemic leaders' tweets do influence follower state anxiety. In addition, followers of trait anxious leaders seem somewhat protected by sudden spikes in leader state anxiety, while followers of less trait anxious leaders are most affected by increased leader state anxiety. Multi-day lagged regressions showcase that this effect is stronger post-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic crisis context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Regression interaction between leader state- and leader trait anxiety on follower state anxiety.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schoenewolf G. Emotional contagion: Behavioral induction in individuals and groups. Modern Psychoanalysis. 1990;15(1):49–61.
    1. Cheshin A, Rafaeli A, Bos N. Anger and happiness in virtual teams: Emotional influences of text and behavior on others’ affect in the absence of non-verbal cues. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. 2011;116(1):2–16.
    1. Tee EY. The emotional link: Leadership and the role of implicit and explicit emotional contagion processes across multiple organizational levels. The Leadership Quarterly. 2015;26(4):654–70.
    1. Hiller NJ, Peterson SJ. Assessment and development first requires a deeper understanding of unique categories of senior leaders: A focus on CEOs and C-level executives. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2019;12(2):211–4.
    1. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs G. State-trait anxiety inventory for adults: Mind Garden; 1983.

Publication types

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.