Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;23(3):282-289.
doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

Detection of Recurrence After Thoracic Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Using FDG-PET-CT

Affiliations

Detection of Recurrence After Thoracic Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Using FDG-PET-CT

Quaovi H Sodji et al. Clin Lung Cancer. 2022 May.

Abstract

Introduction/background: Differentiating local recurrence (LR) from post-treatment changes following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for thoracic tumors is challenging. We sought to evaluate the performance of FDG-PET-CT in distinguishing recurrence from post-radiation changes in patients with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with SABR.

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with stage I-II NSCLC treated with SABR and subsequently followed with surveillance FDG-PET-CT scans from 2004 to 2014. The radiology reports were coded as 0 or 1 if minimally or substantially concerning for LR, respectively, and correlated with outcome. Prognostic factors for false-positive FDG-PET-CT were assessed using logistic regression models.

Results: We identified 145 patients meeting inclusion criteria for the retrospective analysis. Amongst the 39 (26.9%) patients with FDG-PET-CT scans concerning for LR 3 to 24 months after treatment, 14 were confirmed to have LR. Thus, the positive predictive value (PPV) of FDG-PET-CT in identifying LR was 36% (14/39). Factors associated with a false-positive scan included concerning FDG-PET-CT at the earliest post-treatment time point (3 months) (odds ratio 0.67, P= .04) and older age (odds ratio 2.3, P= .02).

Conclusion: Our analysis indicates that the PPV of a concerning FDG-PET-CT after SABR for early-stage NSCLC is relatively low, especially at early post-treatment timepoints, but accuracy is improving over time with institutional experience.

Keywords: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography; Local recurrence; Non–small cell lung cancer; Positive predictive value; Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this work. B.W.L. has received research support from Varian Medical Systems, and is a co-founder and board member of TibaRay. M.D. has received research support from Varian Medical Systems, Illumina, AstraZeneca; paid consultancy from Roche, AstraZeneca, BioNTech, RefleXion, Genentech, Illumina, Gritstone Oncology, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim; travel honoraria from Roche and stock options from Foresight Diagnostics, CiberMed. All other authors have none.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances