Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 5;11(1):39.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01873-5.

Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map

Hanan Aboumatar  1 , Samantha Pitts  2 , Ritu Sharma  3 , Asar Das  3 , Brandon M Smith  4 , Jeff Day  5 , Katherine Holzhauer  2 , Sejean Yang  2 , Eric B Bass  2   3 , Wendy L Bennett  2
Affiliations

Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map

Hanan Aboumatar et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Patient and family engagement (PFE) has been defined as a partnership between patients, families, and health care providers to achieve positive health care outcomes. There is evidence that PFE is critical to improving outcomes. We sought to systematically identify and map the evidence on PFE strategies for adults with chronic conditions and identify areas needing more research.

Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane, January 2015 to September 2021 for systematic reviews on strategies for engaging patients with chronic conditions and their caregivers. From each review, we abstracted search dates, number and type of studies, populations, interventions, and outcomes. PFE strategies were categorized into direct patient care, health system, and community-policy level strategies. We found few systematic reviews on strategies at the health system, and none at the community-policy level. In view of this, we also searched for original studies that focused on PFE strategies at those two levels and reviewed the PFE strategies used and study findings.

Results: We found 131 reviews of direct patient care strategies, 5 reviews of health system strategies, and no reviews of community-policy strategies. Four original studies addressed PFE at the health system or community-policy levels. Most direct patient care reviews focused on self-management support (SMS) (n = 85) and shared decision-making (SDM) (n = 43). Forty-nine reviews reported positive effects, 35 reported potential benefits, 37 reported unclear benefits, and 4 reported no benefits. Health system level strategies mainly involved patients and caregivers serving on advisory councils. PFE strategies with the strongest evidence focused on SMS particularly for patients with diabetes. Many SDM reviews reported potential benefits especially for patients with cancer.

Discussion: Much more evidence exists on the effects of direct patient care strategies on PFE than on the effects of health system or community-policy strategies. Most reviews indicated that direct patient care strategies had positive effects or potential benefits. A limitation of this evidence map is that due to its focus on reviews, which were plentiful, it did not capture details of individual interventions. Nevertheless, this evidence map should help to focus attention on gaps that require more research in efforts to improve PFE.

Keywords: Chronic disease; Engagement; Evidence map; Family engagement; Patient engagement; Self-management; Self-management support; Shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Map of the evidence on patient and family engagement strategies among adults with chronic conditions by level of engagement
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Nickel WK, Weinberger SE, Guze PA. Principles for Patient and Family Partnership in Care: An American College of Physicians Position Paper. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(11):796–799. - PubMed
    1. Clancy CM. Patient engagement in health care. Health Serv Res. 2011;46(2):389–393. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patient engagement, patient safety, and quality of care. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):432-5. https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0021. Accessed 8 Jan 2022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. CMS. Person and family engagement. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Inst.... Accessed 8 Jan 2022.
    1. Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–231. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources