Financial burden associated with attendance at a public hospital emergency department in Johannesburg

Afr J Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;12(2):102-105. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

Abstract

Introduction: More than half of South Africans live below the poverty line. Indirect medical costs can contribute significantly to the financial burden of patients seeking medical care. The aim of this study was to determine the expenses incurred by patients and/or their escorts during a visit to the emergency centre (EC).

Methods: Patients and/or their escorts presenting to an EC in Johannesburg were asked to complete the study questionnaire relating to expenses incurred during a visit to the EC.

Results: Of the total 396 participants that completed the questionnaire, 108 (27.2%) did not have any source of income, 146 (36.9%) were the sole breadwinner in their household and 36 (9.1%) belonged to zero-income households. Among those earning ≤R2000 per month, the mean expenses relating to the EC visit was R240 (SD R372), equating to an average of 33.2% of mean monthly income. Transport costs were the most common expense (n=302, 76.3%), while general practitioner (GP) fees incurred prior to the EC visit accounted for the bulk of the expenses (median R450, IQR 350-820). Participants that earned >R2000 per month were significantly more likely to incur GP fees (p =0.012), while those earning ≤R2000 per month were significantly more likely to take a loan to cover EC related expenses (p =0.014).

Conclusion: A visit to the EC can have a substantial financial impact on patients and their accompanying escorts in South Africa. Strategies should be aimed at identifying and assisting those that are in need of financial assistance to cover indirect healthcare costs.

Keywords: CHCE; Catastrophic healthcare expenditure; Financial burden; Healthcare costs; Indirect medical costs; Out-of-pocket expenses.