HyperArc VMAT stereotactic radiotherapy for locally recurrent previously-irradiated head and neck cancers: Plan quality, treatment delivery accuracy, and efficiency

Abstract

Purpose: This paper demonstrates the clinical feasibility and efficacy of HyperArc VMAT treatments for locally recurrent, locally advanced, or previously irradiated head and neck cancers treated with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).

Materials/methods: First, an anthropomorphic SRS head phantom from the MD Anderson's IROC credentialing laboratory containing a 1.9 cm diameter spherical target, including in vivo dosimetry system, was imaged, planned, and irradiated (25 Gy in 1 fraction) using HyperArc VMAT with a 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF) beam. Second, RANDO phantom was imaged, planned, and irradiated (35 Gy in 5 fractions) by generating eight HyperArc VMAT plans (4 right, 4 left neck tumors) at different anatomical locations (C1-C4). Average tumor volume was 21.7 cm³ up to 32.3 cm³ . Distance to isocenter from the central marker of the Encompass device down to neck was 25.8 cm up to 28.0 cm and 24.3 cm up to 27.1 cm for left- and right-sided neck tumors, respectively, and 9 cm from both lateral markers defined by the patient protection zone. Third, seven recurrent head and neck cancer patients with 80.3 cm³ tumors on average, and up to 159 cm³ , were imaged, planned, and treated with 30-40 Gy in 5 fractions with HyperArc SRT. Plan quality, treatment delivery accuracy, and efficiency are reported herein.

Results: Phantom irradiation results met all the compliance requirements set forth by the IROC for HyperArc SRS treatment. For end-to-end RANDO phantom tests, a highly conformal target dose distribution with 50% isodose fall-off within 5 mm from the surface of the target was obtained. Average beam modulation factor, beam-on-time, and overall treatment time were 2.9, 2.56 min, and 13.96 min with 99.1% pre-treatment quality assurance pass rate for the 2%/2 mm gamma criteria, respectively. Immediately adjacent critical structures, such as the spinal cord (maximum, 3.9 Gy and 0.35 cm³ of cord, 3.7 Gy) and skin (maximum, 10.3 Gy and 10 cm³ of skin, 5.7 Gy), were spared. Similar results were found on the patient's HyperArc VMAT plans including highly conformal target coverage, sharp dose fall-off, and low doses to the adjacent critical organs such as the spinal cord (< 5 Gy). Average perfect pitch couch correction was <1.5 mm and 2° in each direction. Average beam-on-time was approximately 3.21 min and treatments were completed within 15 min.

Conclusion: For recurrent head and neck SRT treatments, HyperArc VMAT provided highly conformal dose distributions, rapid dose fall-off, excellent sparing of adjacent critical organs, and highly accurate treatments that could be delivered down to the C4 vertebral level. This could potentially allow for delivery of HyperArc SRT to patients with glomus tumors as well to those who may not tolerate frame-based SRS treatment. Clinical follow up of these patients is ongoing to confirm the therapeutic benefits of this novel treatment option.

Keywords: Delivery efficiency; head and neck SRT; hyperArc VMAT; recurrent; treatment option.