Applying utility values in cost-effectiveness analyses of lung cancer screening: A review of methods

Lung Cancer. 2022 Apr:166:122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

Abstract

Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in high-risk populations has been shown in randomised controlled trials to lead to early diagnosis and reduced lung cancer mortality. However, investment into screening will largely depend on the outcomes of cost-effectiveness analyses that demonstrate acceptable costs for every quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The methods used to apply utility values to measure QALYs can significantly impact the outcomes of cost-effectiveness analyses and if applied inaccurately can lead to unreliable estimates. We reviewed the use of utility values in 26 cost-effectiveness analyses of lung screening with LDCT conducted between 2005 and 2021, and found considerable variation in methods. Specifically, authors made different assumptions made relating to (i) baseline quality-of-life among screening participants, (ii) potential harms from screening, (iii) utilities and disutilities applied to lung cancer health states, and (iv) quality-of-life for lung cancer survivors. We discuss how each of these assumptions can influence incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Key recommendations for future evaluations are (i) that modelling studies should justify the choice of baseline utilities, especially if patients are assumed to recover fully after curative treatment; (ii) the impact of false positive scans on quality-of-life should be modelled, at least in sensitivity analyses; (iii) modellers should justify assumptions relating to post-operative recovery, preferably based on knowledge of local practices; (iv) utilities applied to a lung cancer diagnosis should be appropriately sourced and calculated; and (v) adjustment for age-related declines in quality-of-life should be considered, especially for models that examine lifetime horizons.

Keywords: Cancer screening; Cost effectiveness; Health status indicators; Lung cancer; Quality-adjusted life years.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Early Detection of Cancer* / methods
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms*
  • Mass Screening
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods