Comparison of short-term outcomes between single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial

Wenhao Teng; Jingfu Liu; Wenju Liu; Jianping Jiang; Meimei Chen; Cheng Wei; Choon Seng Chong; Weidong Zang

doi:10.21037/tcr-21-1916

Comparison of short-term outcomes between single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial

Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Feb;11(2):358-366. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1916.

Authors

Wenhao Teng¹, Jingfu Liu², Wenju Liu¹, Jianping Jiang¹, Meimei Chen¹, Cheng Wei¹, Choon Seng Chong³, Weidong Zang¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
² Department of Blood Transfusion, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
³ Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Abstract

Background: The technical safety and efficacy of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS+1) for distal gastric cancer remain unclear. This study was performed to compare the short-term outcomes of patients with distal gastric cancer undergoing SILS+1 versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS).

Methods: This randomized controlled trial involved patients with clinical stage cT1b-3N0-2M0 distal gastric cancer. The patients were randomized to the CLS group or SILS+1 group. The surgical and pathologic outcomes, postoperative mortality, and pain intensity were compared between the two groups.

Results: From January 2019 to April 2021, 117 patients were enrolled and assigned to either the CLS group (n=59) or SILS+1 group (n=58). The clinical characteristics, including blood loss, tumor diameter, pathologic stage, number of lymph nodes harvested, and postoperative recovery, were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the overall postoperative complication rates between the CLS group and SILS+1 group (10.2% vs. 6.9%, respectively; P=0.743). The Clavien-Dindo classification was also comparable (P=0.435). However, the operating time was significantly longer in the CLS group than SILS+1 group (207.0±41.2 vs. 185.1±40.7 min, respectively; P=0.005), and the total incision length was significantly shorter in the SILS+1 group than CLS group (6.1±0.6 vs. 7.6±0.7 cm, respectively; P=0.000). Moreover, on the third day after surgery, the visual analog scale (VAS) score was significantly higher in the CLS group than SILS+1 group (1.6±0.6 vs. 0.6±0.7, respectively; P=0.000).

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that SILS+1 for distal gastric cancer performed by an experienced surgeon might be a feasible and safe technique with better cosmetic results and less pain in strictly selected patients.

Trial registration: This trial was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100051491).

Keywords: Single-incision plus one-port; gastrectomy; gastric cancer; laparoscopic surgery.