Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and immunogenicity between MW032 (denosumab biosimilar) and Xgeva® (denosumab) in healthy Chinese subjects.
Study design: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-controlled design study, 120 healthy male subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive a single dose subcutaneous injection of 120 mg MW032 or Xgeva®, with an observation period of 161 days. The primary endpoint was the bioequivalence of PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t), and secondary endpoints including PD parameters, safety, and immunogenicity.
Results: One hundred and twelve subjects completed the study, including 56 subjects in each group. The geometric mean ratio and 90% CI for AUC0-t and Cmax were 1.117 (1.034, 1.205) and 1.060 (0.984, 1.142), respectively, which were both within the equivalence interval (0.8, 1.25). The inter-subject variation ranged from 21.37% to 27.37%. The PD parameters between MW032 and Xgeva® were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in the positive incidence of anti-drug antibody test between the two groups. Both MW032 and Xgeva® appeared to be well-tolerated and no Grade 3 or above serious adverse reactions occurred. The adverse reactions observed in the study were reported for denosumab generally. Moreover, there were no high-incidence or previously unreported adverse reactions.
Conclusion: This study evidenced that the PK profiles of MW032, a denosumab biosimilar, and Xgeva® were bioequivalent. We also found that the PDs, safety, and immunogenicity were similar between the two drugs. Therefore, our results supported the next confirmatory studies for the development of MW032.
Keywords: Anti-RANKL; Biosimilar; Denosumab; MW032; Pharmacokinetics; Safety.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.