Patient and practitioner perspectives on the design of a simulated affective touch device to reduce procedural anxiety associated with radiotherapy: a qualitative study
- PMID: 35296471
- PMCID: PMC8928300
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050288
Patient and practitioner perspectives on the design of a simulated affective touch device to reduce procedural anxiety associated with radiotherapy: a qualitative study
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to elicit the views of relevant stakeholders on the design of a device using simulated affective touch to reduce procedural anxiety surrounding radiotherapy and imaging.
Design: This qualitative study collected data from focus groups which were then analysed using inductive thematic analysis in line with Braun and Clarke's methods.
Participants and setting: Twenty patients and carers were recruited, as well as 10 healthcare practitioners involved in either delivering radiotherapy or imaging procedures.
Results: Patients, carers and healthcare practitioners agreed on some aspects of the device design, such as ensuring the device is warm and flexible in where it can be used on the body. However, patient and healthcare practitioner cohorts had at times differing viewpoints. For example, healthcare practitioners provided professional perspectives and required easy cleaning of the device. Meanwhile patients focused on anxiety-relieving factors, such as the tactile sensation of the device being either a vibration or pulsation. There was no consensus on who should control the device.
Conclusions: The desired features of a simulated affective touch device have been investigated. Different priorities of patients and their carers and healthcare practitioners were evident. Any design must incorporate such features as to appease both groups. Areas where no consensus was reached could be further explored, alongside including further patient and public involvement in the form of a project advisory group.
Keywords: oncology; qualitative research; radiotherapy.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017. PMID: 28105690
-
The role of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool in palliative home care: A qualitative study of practitioners' perspectives of its impact and mechanisms of action.Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):392-400. doi: 10.1177/0269216315596662. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Palliat Med. 2016. PMID: 26199133
-
Not as simple as "fear of the unknown": A qualitative study exploring anxiety in the radiotherapy department.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Mar;31(2):e13564. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13564. Epub 2022 Feb 21. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022. PMID: 35191096 Free PMC article.
-
[Nursing home placement of people with dementia: a secondary analysis of qualitative data and literature review on perspectives of informal caregivers and healthcare professionals].Pflege. 2018 Jun;31(3):155-166. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000611. Epub 2018 Mar 8. Pflege. 2018. PMID: 29514552 Review. German.
-
Feel-Good Requirements: Neurophysiological and Psychological Design Criteria of Affective Touch for (Assistive) Robots.Front Neurorobot. 2021 Jul 6;15:661207. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.661207. eCollection 2021. Front Neurorobot. 2021. PMID: 34295234 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of fear of hospitalization scale among outpatients: A validation study.Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1095905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1095905. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36710810 Free PMC article.
References
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer . Cancer tomorrow - Estimated number of new cases from 2020 to 2040. Available: https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/en/dataviz/isotype [Accessed 15th Dec 2020].
-
- Delaney G, Jacob S, Featherstone C, et al. . The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer 2005;104:1129–37. - PubMed
-
- Holmes N, Williamson K. A survey of cancer patients undergoing a radical course of radiotherapy, to establish levels of anxiety and depression. J Radiother Pract 2008;7:89–98. 10.1017/S1460396908006304 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical