Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e050288.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050288.

Patient and practitioner perspectives on the design of a simulated affective touch device to reduce procedural anxiety associated with radiotherapy: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Patient and practitioner perspectives on the design of a simulated affective touch device to reduce procedural anxiety associated with radiotherapy: a qualitative study

Hugo Hall et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to elicit the views of relevant stakeholders on the design of a device using simulated affective touch to reduce procedural anxiety surrounding radiotherapy and imaging.

Design: This qualitative study collected data from focus groups which were then analysed using inductive thematic analysis in line with Braun and Clarke's methods.

Participants and setting: Twenty patients and carers were recruited, as well as 10 healthcare practitioners involved in either delivering radiotherapy or imaging procedures.

Results: Patients, carers and healthcare practitioners agreed on some aspects of the device design, such as ensuring the device is warm and flexible in where it can be used on the body. However, patient and healthcare practitioner cohorts had at times differing viewpoints. For example, healthcare practitioners provided professional perspectives and required easy cleaning of the device. Meanwhile patients focused on anxiety-relieving factors, such as the tactile sensation of the device being either a vibration or pulsation. There was no consensus on who should control the device.

Conclusions: The desired features of a simulated affective touch device have been investigated. Different priorities of patients and their carers and healthcare practitioners were evident. Any design must incorporate such features as to appease both groups. Areas where no consensus was reached could be further explored, alongside including further patient and public involvement in the form of a project advisory group.

Keywords: oncology; qualitative research; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An outline of the overarching themes and the subsequent subthemes within. The Venn diagram demonstrates where the patients and healthcare professionals agree and disagree with each other.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer . Cancer tomorrow - Estimated number of new cases from 2020 to 2040. Available: https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/en/dataviz/isotype [Accessed 15th Dec 2020].
    1. Delaney G, Jacob S, Featherstone C, et al. . The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer 2005;104:1129–37. - PubMed
    1. Begg AC, Stewart FA, Vens C. Strategies to improve radiotherapy with targeted drugs. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:239–53. 10.1038/nrc3007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elsner K, Naehrig D, Halkett GKB, et al. . Reduced patient anxiety as a result of radiation therapist-led psychosocial support: a systematic review. J Med Radiat Sci 2017;64:220–31. 10.1002/jmrs.208 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holmes N, Williamson K. A survey of cancer patients undergoing a radical course of radiotherapy, to establish levels of anxiety and depression. J Radiother Pract 2008;7:89–98. 10.1017/S1460396908006304 - DOI