Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 35305308
- PMCID: PMC8926412
- DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00043-1
Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Awake prone positioning has been broadly utilised for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure, but the results from published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the past year are contradictory. We aimed to systematically synthesise the outcomes associated with awake prone positioning, and evaluate these outcomes in relevant subpopulations.
Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, two independent groups of researchers searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MedRxiv, BioRxiv, and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs and observational studies (with a control group) of awake prone positioning in patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure published in English from Jan 1, 2020, to Nov 8, 2021. We excluded trials that included patients intubated before or at enrolment, paediatric patients (ie, younger than 18 years), or trials that did not include the supine position in the control group. The same two independent groups screened studies, extracted the summary data from published reports, and assessed the risk of bias. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to pool individual studies. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty and quality of the evidence. The primary outcome was the reported cumulative intubation risk across RCTs, and effect estimates were calculated as risk ratios (RR;95% CI). The analysis was primarily conducted on RCTs, and observational studies were used for sensitivity analyses. No serious adverse events associated with awake prone positioning were reported. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021271285.
Findings: A total of 1243 studies were identified, we assessed 138 full-text articles and received the aggregated results of three unpublished RCTs; therefore, after exclusions, 29 studies were included in the study. Ten were RCTs (1985 patients) and 19 were observational studies (2669 patients). In ten RCTs, awake prone positioning compared with the supine position significantly reduced the need for intubation in the overall population (RR 0·84 [95% CI 0·72-0·97]). A reduced need for intubation was shown among patients who received advanced respiratory support (ie, high-flow nasal cannula or non-invasive ventilation) at enrolment (RR 0·83 [0·71-0·97]) and in intensive care unit (ICU) settings (RR 0·83 [0·71-0·97]) but not in patients receiving conventional oxygen therapy (RR 0·87 [0·45-1·69]) or in non-ICU settings (RR 0·88 [0·44-1·76]). No obvious risk of bias and publication bias was found among the included RCTs for the primary outcome.
Interpretation: In patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure, awake prone positioning reduced the need for intubation, particularly among those requiring advanced respiratory support and those in ICU settings. Awake prone positioning should be used in patients who have acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 and require advanced respiratory support or are treated in the ICU.
Funding: OpenAI, Rice Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests SE discloses consultancy fees from Aerogen, research support from Aerogen and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, and travel reimbursements from Aerogen and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare. JL discloses research funding from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Aerogen, and Rice Foundation, and speaker fees from American Association for Respiratory Care, Aerogen, Heyer, and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare. IP discloses a research grant and speaker fees from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare. YP discloses research support from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare. OR discloses a research grant from Hamilton Medical and speaker fees from Hamilton Medical, Ambu, Fisher & Paykel and Aerogen, and non-financial research support from Timpel and Masimo. DV discloses research funding from Teleflex Medical and Rice Foundation, and speaker fees from Theravance Biopharma. MT discloses consulting fees from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare. JRM discloses research support from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, and speaker fees from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Gilead, Dextro and Linet. JGL discloses consulting fees from Baxter Healthcare and GlaxoSmithKline. KM is the primary investigator for the industry funded trial NCT03808922. MF is a consultant for a start-up company (ProofDx) developing a CRISPR based diagnostic test for COVID-19. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Comment in
-
The pandemic and the great awakening in the management of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Jun;10(6):527-529. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00051-0. Epub 2022 Mar 16. Lancet Respir Med. 2022. PMID: 35305307 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Rethinking the efficacy of awake prone positioning in COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Jun;10(6):e53. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00164-3. Lancet Respir Med. 2022. PMID: 35659008 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Rethinking the efficacy of awake prone positioning in COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure - Authors' reply.Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Jun;10(6):e54. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00167-9. Lancet Respir Med. 2022. PMID: 35659009 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
In COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, awake prone positioning vs. the supine position reduces intubations.Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jul;175(7):JC81. doi: 10.7326/J22-0050. Epub 2022 Jul 5. Ann Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 35785529
Similar articles
-
Awake prone positioning for COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, controlled, multinational, open-label meta-trial.Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Dec;9(12):1387-1395. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00356-8. Epub 2021 Aug 20. Lancet Respir Med. 2021. PMID: 34425070 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials.BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 19;23(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08393-8. BMC Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 37337193 Free PMC article.
-
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 13;2015(11):CD008095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008095.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26561745 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Awake prone positioning for hypoxaemic respiratory failure: past, COVID-19 and perspectives.Eur Respir Rev. 2021 May 5;30(160):210022. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0022-2021. Print 2021 Jun 30. Eur Respir Rev. 2021. PMID: 33952601 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Lung impedance changes during awake prone positioning in COVID-19. A non-randomized cross-over study.PLoS One. 2024 Feb 21;19(2):e0299199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299199. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38381730 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Efficacy of bronchoalveolar lavage combined with prone positioning in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia and atelectasis: a prospective randomized controlled study].Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jan 15;26(1):31-36. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2308013. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 38269456 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Prone positioning effect on tracheal intubation rate, mortality and oxygenation parameters in awake non-intubated severe COVID-19-induced respiratory failure: a review of reviews.Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 20;29(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01661-6. Eur J Med Res. 2024. PMID: 38245784 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the efficacy, safety and influencing factors of concomitant and sequential administration of viral respiratory infectious disease vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Immunol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1259399. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1259399. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 38179050 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of awake prone positioning in COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02829-2. BMC Pulm Med. 2024. PMID: 38166818 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2159–2168. - PubMed
-
- Scaravilli V, Grasselli G, Castagna L, et al. Prone positioning improves oxygenation in spontaneously breathing nonintubated patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a retrospective study. J Crit Care. 2015;30:1390–1394. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
