A Scoping Review of the Healthcare and Hygiene Literature for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Adrienne M Jennings; Jacqueline N Mery; Leslie S Quiroz; Jason C Vladescu

doi:10.1007/s41252-022-00249-7

A Scoping Review of the Healthcare and Hygiene Literature for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Adv Neurodev Disord. 2022;6(3):237-252. doi: 10.1007/s41252-022-00249-7. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

Authors

Adrienne M Jennings¹, Jacqueline N Mery², Leslie S Quiroz³, Jason C Vladescu¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Applied Behavior Analysis, Caldwell University, 120 Bloomfield Avenue, Caldwell, NJ 07006 USA.
² Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, USA.
³ Behavior Change Institute, Alamogordo, USA.

Abstract

Objectives: Previous reviews highlight the similarities in teaching healthcare and hygiene routines to individuals with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities. Additionally, similar interventions are used when interfering behaviors occur. Although these routines are topographically distinct, there are enough similarities to suggest effective procedures for one routine may be used to inform another. This scooping review aims to identify effective teaching and intervention procedures for healthcare and hygiene routines specifically for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. We also evaluated the extent to which functional analyses were conducted; a dimension not included in previous reviews.

Methods: Eligible articles targeted compliance or tolerance within the context of a defined healthcare or hygiene routine as a dependent variable and used an experimental design with a demonstration of experimental control. Articles were identified through PsycINFO, PubMed, and Academic Search Premier databases. Additionally, a hand search of five related journals was conducted. Data were collected on dependent variables, functional analyses, baseline contingencies, teaching procedures, and additional experimental components.

Results: A total of 52 articles met inclusion criteria. Most experiments produced positive outcomes. The findings show all experiments involved a treatment package with multiple components. The most common teaching procedures were graduated exposure and DRA. A lack of functional analyses and social validity was noted.

Conclusions: Component analyses are needed to identify the most effective and efficient procedures. Pyramidal training to teach medical professionals how to provide preventative pyramidal training should be explored.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41252-022-00249-7.

Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder; Developmental disability; Healthcare; Hygiene; Intellectual disability.

Publication types

Review