Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 2:13:829381.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.829381. eCollection 2022.

Differentiate Responses of Soil Microbial Community and Enzyme Activities to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition Rates in an Alpine Meadow

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Differentiate Responses of Soil Microbial Community and Enzyme Activities to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition Rates in an Alpine Meadow

Hongbiao Zi et al. Front Plant Sci. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are the dominant limiting nutrients in alpine meadows, but it is relatively unclear how they affect the soil microbial community and whether their effects are rate dependent. Here, N and P addition rates (0, 10, 20, and 30 g m-2 year-1) were evaluated in an alpine meadow and variables related to plants and soils were measured to determine the processes affecting soil microbial community and enzyme activities. Our results showed that soil microbial biomass, including bacteria, fungi, gramme-negative bacteria, and actinomycetes, decreased along with N addition rates, but they first decreased at low P addition rates (10 g m-2 year-1) and then significantly increased at high P addition rates (30 g m-2 year-1). Both the N and P addition stimulated soil invertase activity, while urease and phosphatase activities were inhibited at low N addition rate and then increased at high N addition rate. P addition generally inhibited peroxidase and urease activities, but increased phosphatase activity. N addition decreased soil pH and, thus, inhibited soil microbial microorganisms, while P addition effects were unimodal with addition rates, achieved through altering sedge, and available P in the soil. In conclusion, our studies indicated that soil microbial communities and enzyme activities are sensitive to short-term N and P addition and are also significantly influenced by their addition rates.

Keywords: N and P addition; alpine meadow; phospholipid fatty acid; rate dependent; soil enzyme activities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Effects of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) addition on soil physicochemical. Values are means ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among the levels of N or P addition in the same below.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Effects of N and P addition on plant community characteristics.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Effects of N and P addition on soil enzyme activities.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Soil microbial composition along N (A) and P (B) addition rates based on principal component analysis (PCA).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Effects of N and P addition on soil microbial biomass (A), PLFA richness (B), the biomass of grenral bacteria (C), fungi (D), gram-positive bacteria (E), gram-negative bacteria (F), and actinomycetes (G).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
The relative contributions of plants and soils to the variations in soil PLFAs (A,C) and enzyme activities (B,D) along N and P addition rates.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis evaluating the effects of N and P addition on soil microbial PLFAs and enzyme activities via pathways of plants and soils. Result of model fitting: chi-squared test = 23.56, df = 21, and P = 0.315. Here, high P-values with the chi-squared tests indicate good model fit to data. Black and blue solid arrows indicate significantly positive and negative effects (P < 0.05), respectively. Dashed arrows indicate the effects are not significant (P > 0.05). Values associated with arrows represent standardised path coefficients. R2 associated with response variables indicates the proportion of variation explained by relationships with other variables.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aciego Pietri J. C., Brookes P. C. (2009). Substrate inputs and pH as factors controlling microbial biomass, activity and community structure in an arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41 1396–1405. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.017 - DOI
    1. Acosta-Martínez V., Acosta-Mercado D., Sotomayor-Ramírez D., Cruz-Rodríguez L. (2008). Erratum to “Microbial communities and enzymatic activities under different management in semiarid soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 39 358–358. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.01.004 - DOI
    1. Allison S. D., Vitousek P. M. (2005). Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37 937–944. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014 - DOI
    1. Augusto L., Delerue F., Gallet-Budynek A., Achat D. L. (2013). Global assessment of limitation to symbiotic nitrogen fixation by phosphorus availability in terrestrial ecosystems using a meta-analysis approach. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 27 804–815. 10.1002/gbc.20069 - DOI
    1. Bååth E., Anderson T. H. (2003). Comparison of soil fungal/bacterial ratios in a pH gradient using physiological and PLFA-based techniques. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35 955–963. 10.1016/s0038-0717(03)00154-8 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources