Reproducibility of radiomics features from ultrasound images: influence of image acquisition and processing

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically assess the reproducibility of radiomics features from ultrasound (US) images during image acquisition and processing.

Materials and methods: A standardized phantom was scanned to obtain US images. Reproducibility of radiomics features from US images, also known as ultrasomics features, was explored via (a) intra-US machine: changing the US acquisition parameters including gain, focus, and frequency; (b) inter-US machine: comparing three different scanners; (c) changing segmentation locations; and (d) inter-platform: comparing features extracted by the Ultrasomics and PyRadiomics algorithm platforms. Reproducible ultrasomics features were selected based on coefficients of variation.

Results: A total of 108 US images from three scanners were obtained; 5253 ultrasomics features including seven categories of features were extracted and evaluated for each US image. From intra-US machine analysis, 37.0-38.8% of features showed good reproducibility. From inter-US machine analysis, 42.8% (2248/5253) of features exhibited good reproducibility. From segmentation location analysis, 55.7-57.6% of features showed good reproducibility. No significant difference in the normalized feature ranges was found between the 100 features extracted by the Ultrasomics and PyRadiomics platforms with the same algorithm (p = 0.563). A total of 1452 (27.6%) ultrasomics features were reproducible whenever intra-/inter-US machine or segmentation location were changed, most of which were wavelet and shearlet features.

Conclusions: Different acquisition parameters, US scanners, segmentation locations, and feature extraction platforms affected the reproducibility of ultrasomics features. Wavelet and shearlet features showed the best reproducibility across all procedures.

Key points: • Different acquisition parameters, US scanners, segmentation locations, and feature extraction platforms affected the reproducibility of ultrasomics features. • A total of 1452 (27.6%) ultrasomics features were reproducible whenever intra-/inter-US machine or segmentation location were changed. • Wavelet and shearlet features showed the best reproducibility across all procedures.

Keywords: Feature; Phantom; Reproducibility; Ultrasound.