Spontaneously hypertensive rats show higher impulsive action, but equal impulsive choice with both positive and aversive consequences

Behav Brain Res. 2022 Jun 3:427:113858. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113858. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

Abstract

Both positive and aversive delayed consequences play an important role in decision making. However, most of research has studied the temporal discounting of the positive consequences, while the study of the aversives is scarce in general and null in some areas. This is the case of research on impulsivity in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), an animal model of ADHD. To evaluate SHRs' sensitivity to aversive delayed consequences, we employed a choice procedure in which subjects chose between a smaller-amount alternative and a larger-amount alternative plus a shock; when preference for the smaller-amount alternative stabilized, five different delays to the shock were presented with the objective of analyzing the recovery of preference for the larger-amount alternative, which is related to the sensitivity to the delayed aversive consequence. To analyze the sensitivity to delayed positive consequences we employed a procedure that evaluated the preference between a smaller-amount alternative and a larger-amount alternative as a function of the delay to the later. Finally, to evaluate impulsive action we employed a DRL 10 s schedule. In all tasks, Wistar rats were evaluated as control strain. The results indicated that choice impulsivity was equivalent between strains, both for positive and for aversive consequences. In contrast, we found a higher level of impulsive action in SHR.

Keywords: ADHD; Impulsivity; Punishment; SHR; Temporal Discounting.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Choice Behavior
  • Delay Discounting*
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Impulsive Behavior*
  • Rats
  • Rats, Inbred SHR
  • Rats, Wistar