Explaining Adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics Screen Time Recommendations With Caregiver Awareness and Parental Motivation Factors: Mixed Methods Study

Shea M Lammers; Rebecca J Woods; Sean E Brotherson; James E Deal; Carrie Anne Platt

doi:10.2196/29102

Explaining Adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics Screen Time Recommendations With Caregiver Awareness and Parental Motivation Factors: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Apr 5;5(2):e29102. doi: 10.2196/29102.

Authors

Shea M Lammers¹, Rebecca J Woods², Sean E Brotherson³, James E Deal³, Carrie Anne Platt⁴

Affiliations

¹ Research Institute, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
² Casimir, St. Cloud, MN, United States.
³ Department of Human Development and Family Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
⁴ Department of Communication, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.

PMID: 35380541
PMCID: PMC9019621
DOI: 10.2196/29102

Abstract

Background: With the increasing integration of technology into society, it is advisable that researchers explore the effects of repeated digital media exposure on our most vulnerable population-infants. Excessive screen time during infancy has been linked to delays in language, literacy, and self-regulation.

Objective: This study explores the awareness of and adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) recommendations related to avoiding screen time for infants younger than 2 years and the motivational factors associated with screen time exposure.

Methods: A mixed methods survey design was used to gather responses from 178 mothers of infants younger than 2 years. The measures included infant screen time use and duration, maternal awareness of screen time use recommendations, and motivations related to screen time exposure. A variety of statistical procedures were used to explore associations between caregiver awareness of and adherence to AAP guidelines for screen time exposure, motivations related to screen time for infants, and the duration of infant screen time exposure.

Results: The results indicated that 62.2% (111/178) of mothers were aware of the AAP screen time recommendations, but only 46.1% (82/178) could cite them accurately, and most mothers learned of them via the internet or from a medical professional. Mothers who were aware of the guidelines allowed significantly less screen time for infants than those who were unaware (P=.03). In addition, parents who adhered to the AAP guidelines reported significantly less infant screen time per day than those who did not adhere (P<.001). Among mothers who reported not adhering to the guidelines, the greatest motivation for allowing screen time was perceived educational benefits. Less educated mothers rated an infant's relaxation as a motivational factor in allowing screen time significantly higher than more highly educated mothers (P=.048). The regression analysis indicated that none of the parental motivation factors predicted daily infant screen time.

Conclusions: These results indicate 2 key approaches to improving adherence to screen time recommendations. First, the awareness of the AAP recommendations needs to be increased, which tends to improve adherence. Second, the myth that screen time can be educational for infants needs to be dispelled.

Keywords: American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations; infancy; mothers and infants; parental motivations; screen time; screen time recommendations.

©Shea M Lammers, Rebecca J Woods, Sean E Brotherson, James E Deal, Carrie Anne Platt. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org), 05.04.2022.