Endovascular and Antithrombotic Treatment in Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Objectives: Ischemic stroke has been estimated to occur in up to 26% of patients with blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI). Antithrombotic therapy (AT) may be used for stroke prevention, but the role of endovascular treatment (ET) remains unclear. We systematically reviewed the literature on AT and ET for the treatment of patients with BCVIs.

Materials and methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched upon the PRISMA guidelines to include studies reporting the use of ET in BCVI patients. Post-ET neurologic outcomes, radiographic responses, and complication rates were assessed. A fixed-effect model meta-analysis was performed to compare treatment-related post-BCVI ischemic stroke rates between AT and ET protocols.

Results: We included 16 studies comprising 352 patients undergoing ET for BCVI. Mean post-ET rates of good neurologic outcomes and radiologic responses were 86.9% (range, 63.6-100%) and 94.0% (range 57.1-100%), respectively. Mean post-ET complication rate was 5.2% (range, 0-66.7%). Seven studies compared the roles of AT (delivered in 805 patients) and ET (performed in 235 patients) for preventing the onset of post-BCVI ischemic strokes. No significant difference in rates of post-BCVI ischemic stroke was found between patients receiving AT vs patients undergoing ET (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.35-1.42, p = 0.402).

Conclusion: AT and ET may be comparable in preventing the occurrence of ischemic stroke following BCVIs. AT may be preferred as the less-invasive first-line therapy, but ET showed favorable rates of post-treatment clinical and radiologic outcomes, coupled with low rates of treatment-related complications.

Keywords: Antithrombotic therapy; Blunt cerebrovascular injury; Endovascular intervention; Functional outcomes; Stroke; Systematic review.