Background: Using "large-for-size" liver graft, graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) ≥4%, has been debated in pediatric liver transplantation due to possible graft compartment after abdomen closure. Meticulous preoperative evaluation with three-dimensional (3D) techniques may prevent these problems. This study compared the safety of large-for-size grafts in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (PLDLT) during the eras with or without 3D planning.
Methods: We defined the 3D era was after November 2017 due to our first implication of 3D printing for surgical planning and subsequently developing a 3D simulation implanting model. From November 2004 to July 2021, we enrolled 30 PLDLT patients with body weight (BW) < 10 kg and categorized them into conventional group: GRWR ≥4% before the 3D era (n = 9), 3D group: GRWR ≥4% in the 3D era (n = 8), and control group: GRWR <4% (n = 13). We followed and compared their clinical outcomes.
Results: The 3D group had the lowest BW and the highest graft volume reduction rate, with all receiving modified left lateral segments (LLS), such as reduced LLS (n = 2), hyperreduced LLS (n = 5), and segment 2 monosegment (n = 1). Overall postoperative complications were similar in conventional and control groups but significantly lower in the 3D group (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.006-0.70, p = 0.025). However, all groups had similar graft and patient survival at 1, 2, and 4 years.
Conclusion: Advanced preoperative 3D planning can decrease post-transplant complications and increase the safety of large-for-size grafts in PLDLT.
Level of evidence: Type of study: Retrospective comparative study; Evidence level: Level III.
Keywords: 3D simulation; Graft-to-recipient ventrodorsal ratio; Graft-to-recipient weight ratio; Large-for-size; Living donor liver transplantation; Pediatric.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.