Defining Diagnostic Error: A Scoping Review to Assess the Impact of the National Academies' Report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care
- PMID: 35405723
- PMCID: PMC9698189
- DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000999
Defining Diagnostic Error: A Scoping Review to Assess the Impact of the National Academies' Report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care
Abstract
Background: Standards for accurate and timely diagnosis are ill-defined. In 2015, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) committee published a landmark report, Improving Diagnosis in Health Care , and proposed a new definition of diagnostic error, "the failure to ( a ) establish an accurate and timely explanation of the patient's health problem(s) or ( b ) communicate that explanation to the patient."
Objective: This study aimed to explore how researchers operationalize the NASEM's definition of diagnostic error with relevance to accuracy, timeliness, and/or communication in peer-reviewed published literature.
Methods: Using the Arskey and O'Malley's framework framework, we identified published literature from October 2015 to February 2021 using Medline and Google Scholar. We also conducted subject matter expert interviews with researchers.
Results: Of 34 studies identified, 16 were analyzed and abstracted to determine how diagnostic error was operationalized and measured. Studies were grouped by theme: epidemiology, patient focus, measurement/surveillance, and clinician focus. Nine studies indicated using the NASEM definition. Of those, 5 studies also operationalized with existing definitions proposed before the NASEM report. Four studies operationalized the components of the NASEM definition and did not cite existing definitions. Three studies operationalized error using existing definitions only. Subject matter experts indicated that the NASEM definition functions as foundation for researchers to conceptualize diagnostic error.
Conclusions: The NASEM report produced a common understanding of diagnostic error that includes accuracy, timeliness, and communication. In recent peer-reviewed literature, most researchers continue to use pre-NASEM report definitions to operationalize accuracy and timeliness. The report catalyzed the use of patient-centered concepts in the definition, resulting in emerging studies focused on examining errors related to communicating diagnosis to patients.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Interprofessional diagnostic management teams: a scoping review protocol.Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 22;12(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02391-2. Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37993968 Free PMC article.
-
Refining a Framework to Enhance Communication in the Emergency Department During the Diagnostic Process: An eDelphi Approach.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 May;50(5):348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.01.013. Epub 2024 Jan 30. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024. PMID: 38423950
-
Patients' Perspectives of Diagnostic Error: A Qualitative Study.J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1759-e1764. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000642. J Patient Saf. 2021. PMID: 32168272
-
Diagnostic error in mental health: a review.BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Sep 19;33(10):663-672. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016996. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024. PMID: 38575311 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532239 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of a Natural Language Processing Approach to Identify Diagnostic Errors and Analysis of Safety Learning System Case Review Data: Retrospective Cohort Study.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 26;26:e50935. doi: 10.2196/50935. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39186764 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding diagnostic conversations in clinical practice: A systematic review.Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Nov;116:107949. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107949. Epub 2023 Aug 26. Patient Educ Couns. 2023. PMID: 37660463 Free PMC article.
-
Collaborative Diagnostic Conversations Between Clinicians, Patients, and Their Families: A Way to Avoid Diagnostic Errors.Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023 Jul 7;7(4):291-300. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.06.001. eCollection 2023 Aug. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023. PMID: 37457857 Free PMC article.
-
Japanese Internists' Most Memorable Diagnostic Error Cases: A Self-reflection Survey.Intern Med. 2024 Jan 15;63(2):221-229. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1494-22. Epub 2023 Jun 7. Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 37286507 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Medford-Davis L Park E Shlamovitz G, et al. . Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2016;33:253–259. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
