Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 1;18(8):770-778.
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000999. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

Defining Diagnostic Error: A Scoping Review to Assess the Impact of the National Academies' Report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care

Affiliations
Review

Defining Diagnostic Error: A Scoping Review to Assess the Impact of the National Academies' Report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care

Traber D Giardina et al. J Patient Saf. .

Abstract

Background: Standards for accurate and timely diagnosis are ill-defined. In 2015, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) committee published a landmark report, Improving Diagnosis in Health Care , and proposed a new definition of diagnostic error, "the failure to ( a ) establish an accurate and timely explanation of the patient's health problem(s) or ( b ) communicate that explanation to the patient."

Objective: This study aimed to explore how researchers operationalize the NASEM's definition of diagnostic error with relevance to accuracy, timeliness, and/or communication in peer-reviewed published literature.

Methods: Using the Arskey and O'Malley's framework framework, we identified published literature from October 2015 to February 2021 using Medline and Google Scholar. We also conducted subject matter expert interviews with researchers.

Results: Of 34 studies identified, 16 were analyzed and abstracted to determine how diagnostic error was operationalized and measured. Studies were grouped by theme: epidemiology, patient focus, measurement/surveillance, and clinician focus. Nine studies indicated using the NASEM definition. Of those, 5 studies also operationalized with existing definitions proposed before the NASEM report. Four studies operationalized the components of the NASEM definition and did not cite existing definitions. Three studies operationalized error using existing definitions only. Subject matter experts indicated that the NASEM definition functions as foundation for researchers to conceptualize diagnostic error.

Conclusions: The NASEM report produced a common understanding of diagnostic error that includes accuracy, timeliness, and communication. In recent peer-reviewed literature, most researchers continue to use pre-NASEM report definitions to operationalize accuracy and timeliness. The report catalyzed the use of patient-centered concepts in the definition, resulting in emerging studies focused on examining errors related to communicating diagnosis to patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Academy of Medicine . Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015. doi:10.17226/21794. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Meyer AND, Thomas EJ. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:727–731. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medford-Davis L Park E Shlamovitz G, et al. . Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2016;33:253–259. - PubMed
    1. Singh H Giardina TD Meyer AND, et al. . Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:418–425. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh H Thomas EJ Mani S, et al. . Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2010;169:1578–1586. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types